|
| quote: | Originally posted by montana
no, they were equally "ugly", and yes there was. it was called hiring a talented singer to either sing the whole track or backup (but the backup being a heavy backup singing).
and then having said pop star go up and being the pretty popstar and lip sync to music.
or in the case of sabrina salerno & samantha fox. don't even bother to do anything, focus all marketing on the tits.
eric, don't fall into the trap of wearing the wrong nostalgia goggles. it makes you retarded. |
well trust me i didnt listen to pop ever, my whole life i listened to rock and hip hop. i divulged in some "electornica" through those years too. I never followed pop culture or fashion or who was what. All I am saying is that pop stars nowadays like gaga and kesha look terrible. at least madonna and spears and kylie's had a little bit of sex appeal. Gaga has a dick, Kesha looks like a slob and neither one of them can perform. So hwy o why do the have the spotlight.
You're right about the back up singer, but to have the spotlight you needed to look good. now all im saying is that you dont even need that. I dont see what the difference between kesha running around on stage and some next slob. neither one has talent or looks.
___________________
| quote: | Originally posted by DjWhooCares
e-bully |
|
