|
| quote: | | Ghosts IMO could easily exist in some other form or world. |
Precisely my point.
If we take the laws of physics to be universal (i.e. pertaining to the entirity of the universe) then to have the detatched souls of dead organisms walking around in what appears to be the form of "light" (that is they seem to be composed of either light/electricity/some such element) would appear to be in direct contradiction of our natural laws.
If ghosts do exist in another universe that is not privy to the laws of ours, then surely there is no way we can know about it, much less see them walking around in our universe, contradicting the laws of our physics (they should not be visible at all - on film or otherwise - if they are, as I described, composed of either light or electricity).
| quote: | | Remember, YOU are YOUR BODY, YOU are not IN YOUR BODY. If your body dies, YOU DIE. |
I'd have to agree.
For anyone who believes in the afterlife there are several problems that must be addressed.
Firstly, I am operating under the assumption that it is the "soul" that is carried through into the afterlife, or at least some comperable part of ourselves. That is, there is some transcendent part to our personhood that leaves our physical bodies when we die and enters some other dimension or universe.
Anyway, assuming that my above assumption is correct, we face a number of problems. Without appealing to abject, basless assumptions, please answer these questions:
- What form does the soul take? Is it physical (in which case it is most definately attached to the physical part of ourselves and can in no way be considered "transcendent") or entirely immaterial (in which case how can it inhabit our very physical bodies in this very physical universe)?
- If we die old and senile, are we doomed forever to live in such a state? What if we die just weeks or months after birth? What state do we live out our afterlife in?
- If you argue that in the case of dying "old and senile" our souls take the form of us at the "apex" of our lives (or some similarly arbitrary point in our lives) then who determines where this point may be, and by what criteria is this determination made? If we die at the age of 80 yet we adopt the mindset of ourselves in our afterlife at our "peak" at age 25, then are the final 65 years of our lives forgotten? What point would there be then, living past our peaks in this sense?
- If you argue that babies are sent into the afterlife assuming the form of their "potential peak" (that is, the person they would have grown up to be) then what does this say about free will? What is the point of existing at all if we are all treading down a predestined path? If our personhood and, indeed, our souls are shaped primarily by experience (you'll have a hard time arguing that they are not) then what kind of souls can babies possibly carry into the afterlife?
- Do you believe that the afterlife is destined to be better - a more pleasureable place to exist - than this life? If so, why do you continue to exist? What is to be gained from this mortal toil, when there is the expectation of a much grander life on the other side of death?
- Is the afterlife infinite? If not, then how long does it last for? How long would you like it to last for? If it is infinite, then the question must be asked, how long before you tire of living? How long before there is nothing left to experience? Is there an opt out clause? Do you really want to live forever? Infinity is a long time......
And so on.
This isn't an attempt at refuting the notion of an afterlife by the way. I just think that anyone who professes to believe in an afterlife should be aware of these questions before they can have any claim to knowledge in this respect.
Reality shapes you, but you cannot shape reality.
|