Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Main Forums > Music Discussion > Theory: Less repetitive music = More repetitive listening
Pages (5): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
SYSTEM-J
IDKFA.



Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Manchester

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
When I think of non-repetitive stuff, I think of epic things that move through a whole bunch of different melodies and moods, like a symphony or multi-part prog rock track. So it would be the opposite for me.


Multi-part prog rock tracks still tend to involve far more repetition of phrases without notable development than pop music.


___________________
Mixes:
> Maximum Elevation [Progressive House]
> DI.FM 26th Anniversary Guest Mix [Progressive House]
> Live @ Dance:Love:Hub London, 11.10.2025
> Higher Peaks [Progressive House]
> Dance:Love:Hub Afterparty (The Return) 23.11.24

Like these sets? Come see me play live at Kibosh in Manchester: https://www.instagram.com/kibosh.mcr/

Old Post Oct-27-2010 01:05  England
Click Here to See the Profile for SYSTEM-J Click here to Send SYSTEM-J a Private Message Visit SYSTEM-J's homepage! Add SYSTEM-J to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
sandstorm03
...



Registered: Feb 2003
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
I'm not saying they don't. But poppy music is still more likely to use one-off elements, such as a guitar solo, a middle eight or a distinctive intro.


can you name some of your favorites? just to see how you are defining pop music?


___________________
Time exists so everything doesn't happen at once. Space exists so everything doesn't happen to you

Old Post Oct-27-2010 01:22  Italy
Click Here to See the Profile for sandstorm03 Click here to Send sandstorm03 a Private Message Add sandstorm03 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
nefardec
Tranceaddict in tranning



Registered: Oct 2004
Location:

I would say that your theory applies to my own experience.

In my own listening practices, super repetitive tracks tend to be reserved for very particular moods, and usually once at a time. The music I (re)listen to the most frequently is usually more song-based music of shorter length.

The drawn-out tracks are nice for certain specific moods I might have. I would think of them more like minimalist paintings or specific colors inspire a narrow but intense resonance. Without the right mood, the tracks tend to be unfavorable or boring even - if it's repetitive, it's got to be just what I want to hear at the moment.

Club tracks can be very fickle like this.

The things I listen to more frequently tend to be the music I would classify simply as 'good'. Music that always hits the spot or resonates with me no matter what my listening circumstance or mood is.

I also tend to listen more to entire albums on repeat than individual tracks, which means that individual tracks in the albums get higher play counts than they would if I didnt have the album.

Music that is shorter and sweeter tends to encourage me to want to immediately want to listen again, as if I can't get enough of the feeling.

I also tend to like to listen to extended sets of music than individual tracks. In general I don't favor listening to something over and over again - I think as a DJ I can't help but hear a song and then feel inspired to place another song after it which compliments the previous song and takes me somewhere else, or builds something, compounding and elaborating on the theme or mood.

Old Post Oct-27-2010 01:45 
Click Here to See the Profile for nefardec Click here to Send nefardec a Private Message Add nefardec to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
SYSTEM-J
IDKFA.



Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Manchester

quote:
Originally posted by sandstorm03
can you name some of your favorites? just to see how you are defining pop music?










Wasting half an hour listening to this tracks has reminded me of another thing: I don't listen to much pop music, but the few pop songs I do like I really fucking like.


___________________
Mixes:
> Maximum Elevation [Progressive House]
> DI.FM 26th Anniversary Guest Mix [Progressive House]
> Live @ Dance:Love:Hub London, 11.10.2025
> Higher Peaks [Progressive House]
> Dance:Love:Hub Afterparty (The Return) 23.11.24

Like these sets? Come see me play live at Kibosh in Manchester: https://www.instagram.com/kibosh.mcr/

Old Post Oct-27-2010 02:22  England
Click Here to See the Profile for SYSTEM-J Click here to Send SYSTEM-J a Private Message Visit SYSTEM-J's homepage! Add SYSTEM-J to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
nefardec
Tranceaddict in tranning



Registered: Oct 2004
Location:

i like this passage from Hazrat Inayat Kahn's "Mysticism of Sound & Music" as much as it relates to what I was talking about specificity of mood in repetitive tracks.

quote:
Mahadeva made his instrument as a help for the human body and mind, considering its condition in the morning, in the midst of the day, in the afternoon, in the night and when waking at dawn. He found that at every time of the day and night a particular effect was made upon the human body and spirit, and that a rhythm akin to that particular time should be prescribed psychologically and mystically in order to elevate the soul. And therefore a psychological science of music was made by Mahadeva, a science which was called Raga which means emotion; emotion controlled and used to the best purpose.

Old Post Oct-27-2010 02:30 
Click Here to See the Profile for nefardec Click here to Send nefardec a Private Message Add nefardec to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Tangil
The Palatial Cat



Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Sky Limousine

Intersting topic.

I wonder if it's because poppier music generally has something catchy like a melodic hook or a chorus, which you only hear a few times in the song; whereas more repetitive music, and in particular, electronic music is more consistent throughout the piece. So, rather than getting your fix only once or twice in a few miniutes, for repetitive music it is more constant and therefore you don't need to replay the tune as often.

Old Post Oct-27-2010 07:11  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for Tangil Click here to Send Tangil a Private Message Add Tangil to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
montana
dub come save me



Registered: Mar 2003
Location: södertälje. sweden

I thought about this yesterday after you posted it and I still have no clue. pop music of the most formulaic kind is very repetitive and is given far more repeated play by the common person* than the so called ultra repetitive music (dance music or un-danceable minimalist type music or hypnotic type music) listened by the so called enlightened person. this is just elaborative bull saying, well I still have no clue.

jack you said "But poppy music is still more likely to use one-off elements, such as a guitar solo, a middle eight or a distinctive intro."
I usually find that it's this part of "pop" music that is usually taken out of it's context and looped up and made into a ultra repetitive dance-music track.

like i heard Abba's 'gimme gimme gimme' on radio recently but i came in right around the breakdown halfway in, and i as sampling type producer just thought. wow. that's amazing, never noticed that before, someone needs work that into it's own groove.



*even though a lot of these people don't really have a specific taste but follow commercial radio and tv. my younger sister for instance, who even though has a particular liking of stuff still has 30 tunes in her spotify playlist and are plowing through them everyday.


___________________
facebook | blog | scrobbler | setarchive | 20160316
"I believe that's referred to as intelligent drum & bass, which obviously means there's a genre of stupid drum & bass out there" (John Peel)

Last edited by montana on Oct-27-2010 at 08:34

Old Post Oct-27-2010 07:29  Syria
Click Here to See the Profile for montana Click here to Send montana a Private Message Visit montana's homepage! Add montana to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
netroM
42



Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Trondheim

quote:
Originally posted by montana
my younger sister for instance, who even though has a particular liking of stuff still has 30 tunes in his spotify playlist and are plowing through them everyday.


___________________

Old Post Oct-27-2010 08:04  Norway
Click Here to See the Profile for netroM Click here to Send netroM a Private Message Add netroM to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
montana
dub come save me



Registered: Mar 2003
Location: södertälje. sweden

I meant her.


___________________
facebook | blog | scrobbler | setarchive | 20160316
"I believe that's referred to as intelligent drum & bass, which obviously means there's a genre of stupid drum & bass out there" (John Peel)

Old Post Oct-27-2010 08:35  Syria
Click Here to See the Profile for montana Click here to Send montana a Private Message Visit montana's homepage! Add montana to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Trance-M
Since 1994 tranceaddict



Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Limburg, Netherlands

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
When I think of non-repetitive stuff, I think of epic things that move through a whole bunch of different melodies and moods, like a symphony or multi-part prog rock track. So it would be the opposite for me.


I think this is in line with my own thoughts.
I didn't really think of ultra-repetitive and repetitive, but just repetitive (ultra-repetitive included) and non-repetitive.

In general I think people just like repetitive tracks more.
EDM tracks which were successful in top40 often were/are very repetitive IMO.


___________________

Longest (classic) Trance playlist on YouTube (5000 tracks released up to and including 1997), click here

Old Post Oct-27-2010 08:48  Netherlands
Click Here to See the Profile for Trance-M Click here to Send Trance-M a Private Message Add Trance-M to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Mattsanity.
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Toronto

daft punk begs to differ

Old Post Oct-27-2010 16:11  South Korea
Click Here to See the Profile for Mattsanity. Click here to Send Mattsanity. a Private Message Add Mattsanity. to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
wolftickets
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jul 2003
Location:

Agree, although I listen to alot of repetitive music too.

Old Post Oct-27-2010 17:28  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for wolftickets Click here to Send wolftickets a Private Message Add wolftickets to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Main Forums > Music Discussion > Theory: Less repetitive music = More repetitive listening
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (5): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playback[1969] []

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playback[1969]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:02.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!