quote:

Originally posted by DJ RANN In fairness, I prefer to not have any MP3's and if I have to it's 320. Not being a cock about it but I honesty can hear the difference in most cases (192 vs 320 vs WAV) but then a lot of that is because by the time I burn a track to cd and mix with it, there's a fair bit of degredation going on so I like to start with wavs wherever possible. Hard drive and server space is so cheap these days, why not? For a label, it doesn't matter a single bit, it's not like they're not going to sign your track because they prefer 320 over 192.

It's all about that low fi grit. Get with the program, man.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by dj_alfi change your avatar for fucks sake.

quote:

Originally posted by DigiNut Given that nobody - but nobody - can consistently identify the a 320 kbps track in a 256/320 A/B test, and most people can't even hear the difference at 192 kbps

depends on the stereo-system and experience. i hear difference and it matters to me. but most people play back their music on a boomblaster anyway so the music might as well be mono; save another 50% harddrive right.