|
| quote: | Originally posted by Sentinal
OK I'm not going to argue about the need for transit for inner city areas, but I'm willing to wager a bet that you dont use tranist in Mississauga at all. We have 14 routes that pass Kipling station and go directly to Islington. 3 of which are our busiest in Mississauga, the 26 the 1 and the 3. On any given weekday there are over 125,000 transfers made from TTC and MT. Besides SQ1 it is our busiest hub. There is an absolute need for connections to the suburbs as the city is moving out quicker than it is moving up. The Hurontario line is needed as there are 5 routes in corridor that are solely for travel completely up and down hurontario, each almost always at capacity. That would be the notorious RTE 19, 19A, 19B, 102, and 202. Added to which Brampton is slated to have a route come to SQ1 in the spring which will add more transit congestion.
This much riderership sufficently warrants subways, and dont forget even though Mississauga may be a suburb, it is still 800,000 ppl strong and is neighbors to a major city which permits even more inner transcity transit travel. |
Total transit ridership in Mississauga is 155,000/day total, and the line proposed by v-vaughn would be 22 km through the centre of it (and through some uninhabited industrial area for some reason)...for comparison, thats slightly shorter than the Bloor line (26 km) which carries 500,000/day (which generates a profit for the TTC).
For long-distance suburb to city transportation, commuter trains are the ideal (cheaper and more effective), not subways. Electrify GO trains, improve service levels, and offer more seamless connections with the TTC and other transit providers. And then LRT lines would be used for service within suburbs (so in Mississauga, a line along Hurontario from Port Credit to Brampton Centre, and one along Dundas from Kipling to UofTM).
|