|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: American mass murder in Iraq
| quote: | Originally posted by Znack
In danger of unarmed non-combatants who are trying to rescue wounded? Oh yes, it is a realistic possibility. What would they do, throw medicine after the troops?
Firstly, you apparently do not understand that it is us who are the aggressors here. We attacked a country - in this case, even based on a lie, but that does not matter. When you do attack, you simply can not afford to shoot people without being absolutely sure they've done something wrong.
It is not okay to kill someone to be be on the safe side because they might have had weapons. It could have been if we defended our own country against an attack.
Either you have completely overlooked these things, or you have the most insane, murderous mindset i have experience in a long time, and it would scare me that someone as bloodthirsty roams freely. |
You are an idiot. It is war. The enemy doesn't stop and ask question, hell the take extreme measures to NOT make sure they are killing who they are after most of the time.
| quote: | Originally posted by Znack
So now you are arguing that we must execute all strongly religious people because they might pose a danger one day? |
Yes, that is exactly what I argued.
| quote: | Originally posted by Znack
So you also think witch burnings in medieval times were good? They were legal. Torture of infidels? To keep slaves? It was all legal once.
The law is irrelevant in this context. It is made by humans and is thus an expression of what some people consider to be right. What we are discussing here is exactly about that, if it is defensible that some people find it to be right.
The argument of legality is circular. You really are just saying, because we do it, it is right to do it. |
So then, who is right? Your interpretation of the law? Fuck off. Listen to Banora and quit making Denmark look stupid.
|