Proud/happy 92 rotary owner here... still waiting to find a mixer that is a worthy replacement... this looks nice, but not sure i'd drop $2400 for this.
What I don't like on the 800 is the fact that the EQ's suck, like OMG can they be any worse. There is this delay when lowering or making them louder... This is making me want to go grab a 92 with rotaries...
i wonder if they made them better...
wait maybe google will sue them for the nexus name
___________________
Jaded Raver Union
"Because, even e-tards like you deserve better music." -
Feb-18-2011 19:59
DJ RANN
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2001
Location: Hollywood....
quote:
Originally posted by DizkokidD
What I don't like on the 800 is the fact that the EQ's suck, like OMG can they be any worse. There is this delay when lowering or making them louder... This is making me want to go grab a 92 with rotaries...
i wonder if they made them better...
wait maybe google will sue them for the nexus name
Is that right about the eq's? There's actually a delay/latency? I didn't notice that the last time I played on one.....but I wasn't enamored with the thing anyway so I might have missed it.
Feb-18-2011 22:32
Looney4Clooney
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2010
Location:
is it possible the eq's are controlling the EQ's in traktor and you are experiencing latency ? I just don't see how they could mess that up.
Originally posted by Mad for Brad
is it possible the eq's are controlling the EQ's in traktor and you are experiencing latency ? I just don't see how they could mess that up.
I'm not sure sure but it could be because it's a digital mixer adn therefore converts everything, so when you're using the EQ it's really software changing those values rather that a potentiometer with corssover points affecting the audio signal.
I could be wrong but that would be a plausible explanation if indeed the EQ's have latency and it's not controlling traktor.
Registered: May 2003
Location: Los Angeles (OC) / Mexicali
quote:
Originally posted by Stu Cox
Yep, but the filters on the 800/900 sound really grainy and haven't got anywhere near the control the 92 filters have, so if you really need to cut the bass out of a track the EQ can be your best option.
And my big gripe with the 92 is that the EQ knobs are too close together Can't win
How can you say that about the filters on the 900 when the mixer is not even out yet? For all we know, they could've improved them on the 900. I remember the echo on the 600 sucked, than when the 800 got released, the echo was completely redone.
Feb-19-2011 07:05
DizkokidD
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Gotham City
quote:
Originally posted by DJ RANN
I'm not sure sure but it could be because it's a digital mixer adn therefore converts everything, so when you're using the EQ it's really software changing those values rather that a potentiometer with corssover points affecting the audio signal.
I could be wrong but that would be a plausible explanation if indeed the EQ's have latency and it's not controlling traktor.
I dont have any dj software just 2 cdj mkIII's and 2 1200.. the latency is there.
___________________
Jaded Raver Union
"Because, even e-tards like you deserve better music." -
Feb-21-2011 22:47
Ted Promo
NWO WOLFPACK INSANE
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Can this be my goal??!
Eh, I kinda dig it for a Pioneer. The minor tweaks seem nice (symmetrical design, improved fader design, option to set eqs to full-kill). I've always thought that their layout was pretty lucid for almost anyone to pick up.
The effects are naff. I hope the filters are redone. I hope the eqs are redone to be more sharp and crisp sounding (basically make both the filters and eqs act like xones). Then make it sound like a xone and you'd be set.
Feb-22-2011 04:41
Stu Cox
Supreme smackaddict
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Southampton, UK
quote:
Originally posted by DjWoody
How can you say that about the filters on the 900 when the mixer is not even out yet? For all we know, they could've improved them on the 900.
Fair point, but I seriously doubt it. I've never once heard a Pioneer fan complain about the quality of the filters and they haven't mentioned it in any of the text or videos I've seen about the 900.
And either way, you can tell from the picture that it's still just a single high/low pass knob, so you're still not going to get anything like the control you get with the Xones.
___________________
Stu Cox |
Feb-22-2011 07:59
n3lly
www.n3lly.com
Registered: May 2003
Location: Dublin
I hate the filter on the 800.. Every time i use i feel like i'm damaging people's ears so i have to use it in conjunction with the high eq, reducing that while i use the high pass filter.