|
| quote: | Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
i'm talking about good music, not successful. The kind of producer that can sleep at night knowing they aren't a complete piece of shit. |
Problem is that you keep changing your story. Your original post clearly said "every successful artist" and also "I listen to so many tracks here and the one thing they all lack is something that is unique".
So you listen to the indistinct tracks, which makes the artists successful by some objective measure. Maybe you don't think they're good, but that's a subjective evaluation and also wasn't what you originally said.
Apparently all that's really being said here is "I don't like cookie-cutter tracks", or maybe "I don't think people who produce cookie-cutter tracks should be successful". Which is, well, great I guess, but it isn't really news to any of us.
Everybody hates when other people get a free ride, but the hypothesis that you need to be unique in order to be successful is simply wrong, and probably harmful if you're trying to make a living off of this. You should strive to make unique music because you want to make unique music, not because you think it will make you successful (which is actually less likely than the alternative - change is scary for most).
I'd wager that most of these phone-it-in producers actually sleep pretty well at night. People tend to sleep better when they're not starving.
___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here
|