|
| quote: | Originally posted by srussell0018
Okay, then fucking prove me wrong then. They're both EDM producers/DJs. What's the most widely used ranking system for DJs in the fucking world? Who is ranked in the top 30 on that list? Who isn't even on it?
The U2 comparison is retarded, pretty much everything else you've said is retarded, and nobody has even come close to giving any logical reason why Diplo might make more money per gig other than the fact that he produced MIA's work, and was on a fucking Blackberry commercial. |
Because he's obviously more famous. The guy advertises major brands, he's produced massive smash hits, his music gets absolutely hammered in clubs and on the radio. Check this out:
http://www.google.com/trends?q=diplo%2C+simon+patterson
Your entire argument is based on the DJ Mag poll, and you seem to think the poll decides fame and value. Daft Punk are #44 on the list. Do you think Daft Punk would earn less than Patterson for a DJ gig? How about Paul Oakenfold at #52? Or Fatboy Slim at #82? Being high up on the DJ Mag list doesn't guarantee that you're more famous or worth more than people below you.
What's equally important is Diplo's fanbase: hipsters and (increasingly) pop kids. Neither of whom are directly part of club culture, none of whom care about DJ Mag. He's a cross-over DJ. Simon Patterson, by contrast, is a trance DJ. His fanbase exists entirely in that little trance bubble of Internet forums and radio stations. Trance has been massively over-represented on the DJ Mag list versus its real world popularity for the last ten years. Anyone who doesn't live in the trance bubble knows that.
___________________
Mixes:
> Maximum Elevation [Progressive House]
> DI.FM 26th Anniversary Guest Mix [Progressive House]
> Live @ Dance:Love:Hub London, 11.10.2025
> Higher Peaks [Progressive House]
> Dance:Love:Hub Afterparty (The Return) 23.11.24
Like these sets? Come see me play live at Kibosh in Manchester: https://www.instagram.com/kibosh.mcr/
|