 |
|
|
|
 |
derail
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
|
|
Okay, so what's the overall message here?
We should make non-memorable songs because...?
|
|
Jun-30-2011 02:32
|
|
|
 |
 |
skyhunter
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Sep 2010
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Kysora
I don't know why you guys insist on calling any track that's minimal or lacking a catchy hook "filler", as if the night's focus is all about "memorable" tracks that a lot of people might recognize.
DJs play popular songs because it gets an immediate response out of the people in the audience that know it. That's all there is to it.. the rest of the songs still get played, and the crowd still enjoys them, so what exactly is the harm done here? That those tracks are getting more attention than the minimal/not-so-catchy tracks? That's kind of how music works. |
Well I think it's more opinion then anything. Like "Cafe Del Mar", if someone called it a filler track off of Tranceport, and another song, say, "Words", on that album was the focus. Then years later, not too many people care about "Words", but "Cafe Del Mar" becomes a classic.
Just en example, none of what I said about either of those tracks is true, just context.
___________________
Tranceport is the best album ever....
There is nothing wrong with being musically diverse. 
My Soundcloud
|
|
Jun-30-2011 22:28
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:17.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|