|
| quote: | Originally posted by Lagrangian
Hookers or not, what is obvious is that the US did have a largely secretive presence in Mali, which may or may not have led to ongoing social destabilization, which ultimately provided none other than the US with the ultimate cover to engage in whatever "anti-terrorist" operations it so chose. The name of the cover?
France. |
Accuracy wise, here's a better report of what happened not in Mali, but in its northerly neighbour:
I mean, really. If you take into account what led to the Tuareg revolution, you can see those things they mention make no sense whatsoever, and it's not like Mali isn't messed up enough to have its government overthrown without foreign intervention. The US doesn't have to be behind everything, you know?
|
