|
Re: Xing Encoding Engine...
| quote: | Originally posted by Paul Griffiths 1
That's not true unfortunately. ??? Encoding with a slow PC won't make any difference to the sound quality, unless it can't have the power to encode at a high bitrate, but I don't think that's the case. I used to use Audiocatalyst because it was fast, but then I read some shocking reports on it, and the quality is actually far from Perfect. Then I went to use the Radium release of the Frauhnhofer engine. It was much slower, but the result was a crisper, clearer, overall better sounding rip. And with expensive stereo equipment, I DID notice the difference.
|
Ok man. Just to prove you wrong... with AC i encoded a mp3 last year with my p200-64mb ram. Now that sounds terrible compared to if i would rip it with my p800-128mb ram. The thing is, my old pc couldnt handle the speed of the encoding and constantly produced bodgy mp3s. Now i notice nothing when i rip with AC but still im going to Lame now so i have been converted! hehe.
l8erz /TS
___________________
"Many trances so produced are dangerous, because you can get lost in them. The reason is that the multiple trances can become fixed - relatively permanent - and one stays more or less always in a trance. That is an addictive trance."
|