 |
|
|
|
 |
Jon_Snow
Guest
Registered: Not Yet
Location:
|
|
|
I agree and like I said we don't want to have to fight the Iraqi battles for them. We intervened to stop genocide and contain Isis. We should only support, train, aid in repelling Isis with the condition they will make an inclusive government that functions as a state that can take care of its citizens and defend its borders.
|
|
Aug-14-2014 12:32
|
|
|
 |
 |
Halcyon+On+On
Liebchen

Registered: Sep 2004
Location: midcoast
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Lews
Well, yes, most religions could definitely find such justification if they wanted to. I'm kind of confused about what that has to do with not wanting to bomb ISIS. |
I guess the point I was tip-toeing around is that these aren't just bad Muslims. They haven't merely cherry-picked their religion to come up with excuses, as so many apologists would like to assure you of; This is Islam.
Perhaps they misrepresent Muslims as a collective people, as most of them are pretty nice and don't go around hacking off digits or forcing conversion onto others. But as this region further desiccates and further destabilizes in the coming decades as they sell their geopolitical redemption, barrel by barrel, the West is going to need to have a very frank discussion on moral relativism and intolerance.
| quote: | | It's rather difficult to be tolerant with a group of people who even Al Qaeda called too extreme. |
I agree. It's why I am not a Christian.
| quote: | | Despite my joke about another Crusade, I think it speaks to how terrible ISIS is that the Vatican is condoning violence to stop them. I'm not sure if the article I linked to mentioned this or not, but the Vatican didn't support either the 2003 or the 1990 actions against Saddam - the latter of which most people in the world agree was a legitimate use of force. For the most part the Vatican has been extremely anti-war for a number of decades (at the least) now. |
Right, The Vatican thinks it gets a say because of Christian minorities. And it says military intervention, not humanitarian intervention, is what's necessary. I'm not necessarily disputing this notion, merely the source. Military is an inherently inhumane force; it's purpose is not to save lives, but to broker their cost. I know there are numerous examples of humanitarian deployments and genuinely heroic deeds, but they are mere pageantry for News Networks when it comes to the true cost of intervening in Iraq, again; that humanitarian cost in lieu of these self-appraised Christians' urge to eschew meekness for The Sword, again.
___________________
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
|
|
Aug-14-2014 14:16
|
|
|
 |
 |
SYSTEM-J
IDKFA.

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Manchester
|
|
|
Aug-14-2014 14:44
|
|
|
 |
 |
Vector A
Your petrochemical arms

Registered: Apr 2011
Location: U.S.
|
|
|
Aug-14-2014 15:29
|
|
|
 |
 |
Jon_Snow
Guest
Registered: Not Yet
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
"If we give you the real big guns will you promise to play nice with them?"
"Yes sir! Honest!" |
In the past we have given unconditional aid with hopes of future reforms. I'm suggesting that they should proceed in tandem. Isis is providing us leverage for. insisting on reforms.
Isis is a symptom not the cause.
|
|
Aug-14-2014 17:34
|
|
|
 |
 |
r5a
snake inverter

Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Toronto
|
|
|
Aug-15-2014 01:52
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:41.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|