SVU did an episode based on this (i reckon).

quote:

Originally posted by Silky Johnson What's with all the goddamn rapists these days?

i know, right? i say this all the time. they're all at it.

___________________

Let's just get to page 2 then.

Cosby sweater, bad.

___________________
Freak Out Tóng Zhì

This is page 2.

15PPP4LIFE.

quote:

Originally posted by Joss Weatherby Compared to the US it is incredibly strict. Everything besides real children in sex acts in photos/videos is considered protected speech.

Why the fuck would anyone who isn't a paedophile want to read or write erotic fiction involving a child?

___________________
Mixes:
> Maximum Elevation [Progressive House]
> DI.FM 26th Anniversary Guest Mix [Progressive House]
> Live @ Dance:Love:Hub London, 11.10.2025
> Higher Peaks [Progressive House]
> Dance:Love:Hub Afterparty (The Return) 23.11.24

Like these sets? Come see me play live at Kibosh in Manchester: https://www.instagram.com/kibosh.mcr/

I enjoyed Lolita, and I don't fuck kids.

___________________
Freak Out Tóng Zhì

Try to keep up Jay.

quote:

Originally posted by Joss Weatherby I mean like blatant sex stories where the only point is sex.

___________________
Mixes:
> Maximum Elevation [Progressive House]
> DI.FM 26th Anniversary Guest Mix [Progressive House]
> Live @ Dance:Love:Hub London, 11.10.2025
> Higher Peaks [Progressive House]
> Dance:Love:Hub Afterparty (The Return) 23.11.24

Like these sets? Come see me play live at Kibosh in Manchester: https://www.instagram.com/kibosh.mcr/

I will say, actually, that the UK free speech laws aren't as open as in America. I was absolutely shocked two years ago when I read about a guy going to jail for an offensive joke on Twitter. The joke was apparently so horrible that the press wasn't allowed to quote it and he went to prison for a few years That would never happen in the States. And yeah, I think it involved a minor and sex.

Obviously the UK is one of the freest-speaking countries in the world, just not as much as the US, which is a bit odd.

___________________
Quarantine Classics Brunello di Montalcino (In Transit) Edition [Progressive Classics] (August 2020)
Quarantine Classics - Puligny-Montrachet Edition [Progressive Classics] (April 2020)
What Is Progressive Anyways? [Progressive House Classics] (November 2019)

quote:

Originally posted by SYSTEM-J Try to keep up Jay.

I never read his posts.

___________________
Freak Out Tóng Zhì

quote:

Originally posted by SYSTEM-J Why the fuck would anyone who isn't a paedophile want to read or write erotic fiction involving a child?

I don't know, but they probably shouldn't go to jail for it since it harms no one and involves nothing actually happening in the real world.

Just like people shouldn't go to jail for child porn for drawings of Bart and Lisa from the Simpsons fucking or some ridiculous shit like that. It isn't real, so how can there be a crime.

You could certainly argue it encourages the treatment of children as sexual objects though. We're talking specifically here about fiction written for no other purpose than causing sexual arousal. Towards children. You should know as well as anyone that pornography can influence sexual taste and behaviour. Of all the things to highlight as problematic about freedom of speech in the UK, this should be very bottom of the list.

___________________
Mixes:
> Maximum Elevation [Progressive House]
> DI.FM 26th Anniversary Guest Mix [Progressive House]
> Live @ Dance:Love:Hub London, 11.10.2025
> Higher Peaks [Progressive House]
> Dance:Love:Hub Afterparty (The Return) 23.11.24

Like these sets? Come see me play live at Kibosh in Manchester: https://www.instagram.com/kibosh.mcr/

quote:

Originally posted by SYSTEM-J Of all the things to highlight as problematic about freedom of speech in the UK, this should be very bottom of the list.

Um, I highlighted it because it was relevant to the point I was making.

Also you can make the same argument, with clinical backing I am sure, that fake pornography in cases such as pedophilia actually satiates desires and gives deviants a safe outlet for their urges. If they have the choice between wanking it to some text by another pervert about someone who isn't real and has no possibility of harming anything or anyone or seeking out a real child to have the same sexual release then I think the choice is clear.

Furthermore making the statement that porn influences behavior is highly subject and pretty drastic. For example, just because someone watches rape porn or is in to rape play doesn't mean they are going to go out and actually rape someone or that they want to be raped in real life.

This isn't the first time Nou has defended child pornography. And he wants us to believe he's not a rapist, lol.