quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Mystery I would take a badly mastered masterpiece over pristine sounding turd any day.

Fucking word.

___________________
Youtube
Mixcloud
Twitch

I like where we are going with this conversation (and in civilize way lol), as for my perspective, I do my own mixing and some form of mastering (for strictly reviewing and compliance with my particular vision for this track) like EQ, limiting, compressing, stereo field, a little flavor/color (warmth) and few more little subtitle things.

At the same time I'm a bit frustrated that today music (trace, house, ...) is more about loudness, raisers-drops (like 20 of them in a 9min track lol) and couple of "Trap" part/elements in it then melody whatsoever - it is all about squeezing as much juice as possible from something which is not even worth (in first place) listen to (in some cases).

I guess is just me

Cheers,

Darek

___________________
I like that freedom with no boundaries, no restrictions, no rules setup by somebody else – it's only me and my music.

SoundCloud

Traxsource

Beatport

Facebook

DariusX Page

quote:

Originally posted by TranceElevation Sorry but I disagree. Trance sucks nowadays and I know it, but imo the reasons are far worst than what you're advancing here.

You're looking in the wrong places..

I thought this for a long long time, but the last year or so I've really got back into it.
People like JOC, Aly & Fila, Mark Sherry, Bryan Kearney, Jordan Suckley all play some good music and have restored my faith in trance. They all vary in styles, and yes non of it is hardly ground breaking stuff, but its stuff I like and has got me moving to it again.

I'm not sure the kind of trance you like, but surely someone will cater for your needs?

quote:

Originally posted by Andy28 You're looking in the wrong places.. I thought this for a long long time, but the last year or so I've really got back into it. People like JOC, Aly & Fila, Mark Sherry, Bryan Kearney, Jordan Suckley all play some good music and have restored my faith in trance. They all vary in styles, and yes non of it is hardly ground breaking stuff, but its stuff I like and has got me moving to it again. I'm not sure the kind of trance you like, but surely someone will cater for your needs?

I'm all ears for you. Share the goodies via pm.

We've been off-topic for too long.

I'm out.

___________________
cit. "Back then people danced to a dj set. Nowdays they are recording it with their smart phones."

quote:

Originally posted by TranceLover007 This is really cool that you are sharing your experience with us over here man and sounds like you already know the way most of those labels around operate by lol - it is all about money You would be surprise of the level of mixing/mastering knowledge some of our member poses in this forum and this is the reason why I created this thread -> to pull some of that knowledge out of them Thank you guys for being involve in this very important subject of music production Cheers, Darek

This is going to sound weird for most people. But I actually always tried to avoid learning stuff about music production by reading forums. And this is because in the past I have been shocked about how much nonsense people say on forums. Its not that people are lying. They probably also read it on a forum or watch a youtube video that was telling bulsshit. (you would be surprised how many tutorial videos tell you things that are simply not true) and if you don't know its bulsshit. Then you just think its true, And before you know it, information is being share by everybody not knowing it is bad information.

I Personally bought some books about music production. And this guy that wrote them was great. Because he explains things like you know absolutely nothing about music production. So it is in a language that everybody understands. If I still had the PDF files I would share it with you guys. But the computer it was on crashed. But I looked up his website and he still sells them. http://www.samplecraze.com/catalog/books

I noticed that he also started making videos. Some are free and some you have to pay for. This is new for me. But the guy is really great. And I even emailed him personally couple of times for questions and he helped me out. The big advantage of books is that there are much information that you can write about. But not really make a tutorial movie about. For example tutorials always tell you how to do something and then they show it in the software how to do it. But you won't find a tutorial explaining what sound actually is. (vibrations in the air) And how these vibrations react differently when you do curtain things. Mastering and mixing is all about sound. So understanding sound is extremely useful. But you won't find a tutorial video about it. Ok I start to sound like a commercial

But the point that I am trying to make. Is be careful what you read on forums or see on youtube. Forums are great if you search for specific things. But in my personal experience I just felt better if I had a source that I could trust.
(who knows maybe I am full of shit too haha)

Now these books I mentioned cost money so I am probably not making a lot of people happy with that. haha

But on my youtube channel I have made some playlist with GOOD tutorials. Meaning that I watched every single one of them. And I found them useful. And the info that is being told is accurate. If people are interested. I recommend these playlist I made.

Studio - Software Tutorials
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?li...S25DUQ2webqCv_0

Studio - Software Ads & Reviews
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?li...DB74XKJxyDhBnAH

Studio - DJ & Studio Hardware
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?li...jXOwIXumDR8SOOX

Studio - Ableton Tutorials
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?li...PdB8sEZV8171yc-

In the Studio with Famous Producers
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?li...kG-BB2gk0EYirjV

Native Instruments - Live Performance
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?li...zu5X6fm1svDyaIL

I learned a lot from them.

___________________
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrMyb9mI-M_t6NeCdQwhg73dxRdRzCEoS

quote:

Originally posted by Richard Butler Personally speaking I agree with this but of course if you can combine original good memorable content with good mixing then that's the best of all outcomes. Loads of well mixed releases are throwaway and non memorable derivatives. Your second track down 'Some sort of hurricane' is a real pleasure on the ears and I love that little mid bass sustained wobble in the background, that sort of sound is what makes a techno track good. I sort of sensed already that labels want a finished article and not tooing and froing with an artist, but reading your narrative here brings this into sharp focus for me.

Thanks. It was very difficult to make that bass. I really wanted to have that bass you hear on record labels such as Drumcode. The original was even a bit warmer. But that made the mix of the song a bit more muddy. The record label balanced this more nicely then the original. Like I said, This is one of the few tracks that I can hear the record label did improve it when they mastered it. Because the original had a lot of low and a lot of high. But far less mid. Btw this is also a good tip when you master a track. When you listen to your song in a player like winamp. Look at the spectral analyser. A perfect mix would be that all the bars of the spectral analyser are equally balanced. (that they all reach the top for example) It also helps if you find a similar song. For example I compared my track to a song released by label drumcode. Because they are known to have a lot low end. Then I look at the spectrum analyser of that song in winamp. And then I looked at mine and compared the too. Its not a golden rule or anything that everything has to reach the top and be perfectly balance. But that is why comparing it to a similar song helps. Oh I forgot to mention one important thing about mastering. The stereo balance always have to sound even. It is wrong if your left speaker is louder then your right. You also should consider the fact that most sound systems in clubs. Are actually mono. So I always test my song if it still sounds good in mono as it does in stereo. If you have like crazy stereo effects where you automate panning. Then this might not sound nice or weird in mono. Perhaps you hardly hear curtain sounds at all. Very important thing to keep in mind!

___________________
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrMyb9mI-M_t6NeCdQwhg73dxRdRzCEoS

quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Mystery This is exactly why trance sucks now.

Haha I do agree that trance of today sucks. But I don't think it has to do with just that. I mean you can make any song you want and still make that song sound good. The reason why old trance might sound less well mastered. Has more to do with technological improvements then anything else. My own personal theory about this. Is that a curtain trance sound sells best. (I mean musically not mastering) And that all producers try to imitate that sound the best way they can. That is why so much trance today all sound a like. (but that's my opinion) Because from a musical point of view. A lot of trance today is actually more complex to make. (that does not mean that this make the song any better)I think that dance genres evolve the way they do musically purely for commercial reasons. Even I will admit that I use to prefer old and fast sounding techno. I hated the fact that it went from 140 BPM to 126 BPM. Now I am use to it. But I will admit that when most producers started making a slower techno. I also started to make slower techno. Simply because that was the sound that was currently popular. (now I actually like them both just as much)The truth is. That originality in the Dance industry is not always a good thing. Most record labels want songs that they know will sell well. And when something is new, original, and different. Then this becomes much harder to judge.

___________________
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrMyb9mI-M_t6NeCdQwhg73dxRdRzCEoS

quote:

Originally posted by Seandroid I always send labels unmastered copies.

You mean demos you are trying to get signed?

I do my own mixing and mastering. There isn't much to it. A limiter to keep any strays from crossing the 0db threshold, and an extreme high/low EQ cut. I master a lot quieter than I used to, plenty of dynamics.

___________________
soundcloud

Youtube

Tbh i think bus compression (perhaps multiband if you got skills) saturation widening limiting are trance/edm specific mixdown toppers. you can get away with these being semi transparent and/or augmenting. Mastering goes in for the surgical treatments and dynamics/eq insurance. I; as well, am going to send my shit to Mark Sherry for mastering if it gets that far.

Dynamic Range is dead forever in some very prestigious trance outlets. I see it coming back in some others. Bob and weave!

I mixed down and mastered my album myself.

However I only chose to do so because of budget constraints. I couldn't afford to mix down in a proper studio, nor pay a qualified mastering engineer (sorry Raphie).

I'd have loved to hear what could've been done with a proper studio and engineer though

___________________
-~-

quote:

Originally posted by aquila I mixed down and mastered my album myself. However I only chose to do so because of budget constraints. I couldn't afford to mix down in a proper studio, nor pay a qualified mastering engineer (sorry Raphie). I'd have loved to hear what could've been done with a proper studio and engineer though

you can, Red Cloud will be on Beatport next week
And since I really like your tracks, you can always ask for a TA buddy quote

___________________
Analogue Mastering
Esoteric sound for the discerning ear