 |
|
|
|
 |
SYSTEM-J
IDKFA.

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Manchester
|
|
|
Oct-08-2015 12:32
|
|
|
 |
 |
SYSTEM-J
IDKFA.

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Manchester
|
|
|
Oct-08-2015 18:22
|
|
|
 |
 |
SYSTEM-J
IDKFA.

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Manchester
|
|
|
Oct-08-2015 19:06
|
|
|
 |
 |
DJ RANN
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2001
Location: Hollywood....
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
Seeing that video games are a much more profitable industry than films these days, that would be more or less everyone. |
I wasn't going to even dignify this incredibly shallow excuse of a comparison but I'll bite seeing as others did.
Profitability does not equal popularity in terms of numbers (i.e. "everyone")
Profitability is much higher in the games market for a plethora of reasons:
Most decent Games cost between $40 and $100 as opposed to a cinema ticket which at max is going to $15.
Margins are much higher in the games industry (try 40% to retailer for games as opposed to about 10% for cinemas, which on $15 is fuck all).
More people actually go to the cinema (1.3bn per year) than regularly play video games, and then when you factor in VOD and rentals, Hollywood in terms of impressions or regular goers truly dwarfs the games industry.
Finally, those games industry profitability figures also include in app/game purchases and when you look at the average spend of a die hard gamer, it's often in the thousands per year. So basically you have a much smaller, but far more fanatical base who are willing to hand over large sums to game, as opposed to even the ardent cinema buff who would be hard pressed to spend $600 on cinema tickets in a year (that would mean going at least 4 times a month to the cinema).
So in essence you statement is utter bollocks, and is really nothing more that a statement on the health of margins in the games sector and much less to do with how many people are avid video games enthusiasts.
While Jack may think it's a bulldozer statement, I think grown men in their 30's and 40's playing several hours of video games a night is exactly the same sort of manchild/kidult behaviour that pokemon bothering is.
|
|
Oct-09-2015 02:32
|
|
|
 |
 |
Lira
Ancient BassAddict

Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Brasilia, Brazil
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
That depends entirely on the angle of the criticism. I appreciate you were essentially replying to RANN's characteristically bull-in-china-shop proclamation, but I wanted to make clear my beef is specifically with people completely content to wallow in the same unchallenging, unthreatening shit they liked as children. |
Oh, I see. In that case, I've got a genuine question:
Quite often, music enthusiasts (here, at least), consider electronic music to be garbage because "it's just pressing buttons". And, as much as I love, say, Liam Howlett, I don't think I've ever seen him play Bach on the piano (for the sake of the argument, let's suppose he can't). Would it be fair of a classical music fans to judge The Prodigy according to their own 19th century standards? They could easily dismiss electronic dance music as "simple unchallenging" music. What if we're misjudging Pokemon here and saying it fails to reach a standard it never strived for in the first place?
And I say "we" because I tend to be quite dismissive of it myself and most "nerd culture". But, that's possibly because I outnerded the nerds at my school and got into computer music long before I could feign any interest in computer games 
___________________
Indiana Clones Upcoming Sets
[ I May Upload Something Someday ]
|
|
Oct-09-2015 02:34
|
|
|
 |
 |
AlphaStarred
-__---__-_-_-_-----_

Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
Would it be fair of a classical music fans to judge The Prodigy according to their own 19th century standards? They could easily dismiss electronic dance music as "simple unchallenging" music. What if we're misjudging Pokemon here and saying it fails to reach a standard it never strived for in the first place? |
I've been a fan of classical music for many years, likewise with electronic music, and I've never judged the latter by the former's standards. However, I did stop producing (electronic music) for a while and started playing piano because I did, indeed, feel unchallenged/limited with EM.
I'm going to assume that Jack meant "unchallenging, unthreatening" in the sense that adults should be out living/experiencing what life itself has to offer, rather than stay home and play video games or absorb themselves in childish stuff, like Pokemon. I spoke of something similar to this many years ago on this forum, after my trip back from Mexico.
I have a friend who's very much into gaming, but I'm not judging him. I think he has enough life experience to know what he likes to do with his leisure. On the other hand, an adult who's still into Pokemon? That may be a problem.
|
|
Oct-09-2015 03:31
|
|
|
 |
 |
OrangestO
–30–

Registered: Feb 2010
Location:
|
|
|
Oct-09-2015 03:34
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:16.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|