|
| quote: | Originally posted by Dr. Z
I still don't understand why people see oscars as some sort of a representation of quality in a movie. Its as arbitrary as someone telling you Eminem is the Best singer in the world. There is no way justify that.
Yes... Now you'll start with the "but but, oscars are given to movies which recieved the most votes, blah blah." George bush recieved the most votes, does that make him the best president? |
No, Oscars certainly don't have the sacred last word, but they regard movies as a form of art, rather then a lure for audience. So, it is not an appraise of fame and prominence, but an evaluation of skill and uniqueness. And I don't always agree with the final verdict, but there's always the Hollywood "rules" and because it is an industry where money is the only objective, these rules influence and shape the result.
Take as an example a race for the foreign movie 2002: Amelie vs. No Man's Land. There is no way "No Man's Land" was IN ANY ASPECT a better film then "Amelie", but it was distributed by MGM and Amelie was an independent French distribution. And in the end, who received an Oscar? The Oscars are an american corporation. They run the show.
___________________
..::Adventure is something that while it is happening you wish it wasn't!::..
<<<I am, I flatter myself, completely a citizen of the world. In my travels, I never felt myself away from home.>>>
|