quote:

basicly this treaty, which was signed by most the world's countries (including that of the US and NK), was intent on just putting a 'freeze' on all nuclear programs and keeping the status quo as long as possible. techincally it a signatory would not be allowed to build more nukes, only maintain those it has. the treaty bans selling of nukes and its technology. also non-nuke countries would not seek the technology and in case of attack by a nuclear powered country would have the defense of the world behind it (1968, UN Security Council Resolution 255). now NK has just backed out of the treaty (the very first one to do so) and the UN is being slow to react agian, damn i hate the UN....

So India and Pakistan built their own nukes, and US said almost nothing about it.

___________________
1+1=10

quote:

Originally posted by DrUg_Tit0 So India and Pakistan built their own nukes, and US said almost nothing about it.

India and Pakistan have even tested them out on each others land to show they both carry thiese weapons.....WHY HASNT THE US DONE ANYTHING ABOUT THAT if they are so concerned?!?!??!?

Its all about OIL....NUFF SAID!

___________________
"This place isn't big enough for me to blow it up."
-MARCO V

quote:

Originally posted by Izzy north korea has kicked out of its country all international observers of its nuclear program. in about a week N.K. well be dispatching its fuel cells from its nuclear reactors, something it has never done before, which would then be able to be used for getting plutonium for use in nuclear weapons. if you were G.W.Bush what would you do? if you were the head of state of your own generic country what would you do? what should the UN do?

If i was G.W. Bush I would give more importance and give more attention to N. Korea.

If I was the head of state of my own generic country, I would focus totally on N.Korea and gather the leading nations of the world, and sicuss with the international countries about this, and what must be done.Theres enough prove there, and they even SHRUBB it on bushs face about their making.

___________________
Upcoming:

Michael Andrews Feat. Gary Jules - Mad World (Grayed Out Mix)

And in the end you'd have 2 options. 1st is to isolate NK and put them under sanctions, what is already the case, and the second is to go into a direct war with them risking the possibility that they actually fire those nukes on SK and Japan.

___________________
1+1=10

quote:

Originally posted by Cyrus King India and Pakistan have even tested them out on each others land to show they both carry thiese weapons.....WHY HASNT THE US DONE ANYTHING ABOUT THAT if they are so concerned?!?!??!? Its all about OIL....NUFF SAID!

Because the US hasn't been in a state of war with India and Pakistan for the past 5 decades. Don't forget that a peace treaty was never signed. The United States and South Korea are technically still at war with North Korea. Also India and Pakistan are not poised to invade a US ally. There have been tensions and border conflicts for half a century between NK and the US. Of course the US is more concerned about NK possessing nukes than India and Pakistan.