|
Hey Patticus,
I agree with you and I find your reply interesting, but I think the problem here lies in our definition of the word "trance." I think these two groups of DJ's spin completely different kinds of music. One of them is trance, perhaps, or the other, but not both.
Now, I've seen "trance" as a genre defined like this: Fast-paced, lush, 4/4-rhythm, with prominent synths.
You may say that this describes Trance Anthems, and not all of trance. But doesn't it aptly describe the vast majority of modern trance tunes? I've been downloading lots of trance MP3s for the last several months, and almost all of them fit that description, and are completely unlike Oakenfold's or Sasha's repertoire.
I think here we have a clash of terminology. Many places and services like amazon.com put Tiesto and Sasha into the same "Trance" category, and I think this is wrong. Maybe a new concept like "Trance-Pop" should be introduced.
BTW: If you ask me, I don't think that "trance" is a good term for the definition above, I think "Dance" is. Armin, Tiesto, and Ferry play music that's closer to Dance, whereas the term "Trance" as we know it from literature is better-suited for Oakenfold's dreamy, hazy, brooding style.
|