quote:

Originally posted by DaveSaenz Lol. That's what I said basically when someone pointed out the word "right" can be interpreted in so many ways.

was that in this thread???

___________________
www.elkdee.com
Soundcloud sampler: www.soundcloud.com/elkdee

Saddam is responsible for the murder and torture of millions of Iraq citizens. The fact that if you are in any sort of opposition to him means that you will end up being killed by him and the fact that he is a brutal oppressor makes him what I consider a dictator. He rules by fear. His country is essentially in ruins. What has Bush done? The majority of Americans support this "war". He has not oppressed any american citizens. He has not gone out and actively murderded and tortured people in the opposition (democrats ). I fail to see how you can possibly even take yourself seriously after that. President Bush is by no means a dictator. He was elected in fairly (like another poster said, if you've got a problem with the electoral college system, then go to capitol and try to get it changed. Believe it or not, but this all boils down to one thing, without Saddam in power, many less Iraqis will die. Sure this war will have casualties but FAR fewer than if Saddamn was left in power. I don't necessarily agree with this all out war on Iraq but let me ask you this:how would not getting rid of Saddam be helping the Iraqi people?

___________________
"Laces out Dan!"-Ray Finkle

quote:

Originally posted by DJ El Kay Dee so heres the definition of a dictator (taken from dictionary.com): dictator n 1: someone who rules unconstrained by law [syn: potentate] 2: behaves like a tyrant [syn: authoritarian] so here is a question take 2 leaders...say one is a ruler by virtue of family and passing of "the throne" while the other is a President of a Democratic republic and doesnt listen to the majority of the population in his country... now which is the real dictator??

wait..... let me think..... do you live in america? hold on, it's coming to me.....NO! i am sick of your retarded posts..... i have been trying to be polite with you but you don't get it.... YOUR STUPID!!!! i am so sorry cause this goes against everything i have been trying to be about lately .... but ... SHUT THE FUCK UP! you don't live nor do you understand anything about politics never mind american politics.... i don't know what they tought you in egypt but there are no dictators here.... SADDAm is a dictator..... if this country was under a dictator, those people who are protesting...... would all have been dead..... supressed...silenced....... if this was a dictatorship it would have not been televised....... why CAUSE WE WOULD NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT PEOPLE DISAGREE HERE........ notice nobody goes against saddam? no one even votes against him...... why you ask? CAUSE HE IS A DICTATOR!!!!!!! THERE IS NO CHOICE OVER THERE AND IT IS OBVIOUS!!!!!!!

you never back anything you say up..... <--- makes me think you are making it up as you go

you always accuse people to being biased but you never look at how you favor what ever sources you have (none) what, arte watching comedy central? the latenight show? is that where you get your info? the sci-fi channel?

you claim american news or cnn in biased but your news or whatever you watch has their entire staff sworn to honesty??..... why the fuck are you even on this side of the planet? why aren't you in egypt?
i ask you all the time but you never answer me....... what makes you sources not so bias? what are your sources? POST THEM!!!!!!!! I think your weak minded and that your jumping on the band wagon cause people think it's cool to be against the grain.......

if you quote my post, POST THE SOURCES TO BACK YOU UP!!!!! OTHER WISE IT IS NOTHING BUT IGNORANT OPINION AND OTHER WISE HERESY!!!!! T H I N K B E F O R E Y O U O P E N Y O U R M O U T H!!!!

___________________
Too lazy to make a new siG

quote:

be·nev·o·lent ( P ) Pronunciation Key (b-nv-lnt) adj. Characterized by or suggestive of doing good. bush is a BENEVOLENT dictator, so its all good

Bush is neither benevolent nor a dictator. He did get to power through legal means, although those legal means were unfair. I'm sure that if something like that would happen in another country, the US would keep talking about that country having an unfair voting system, though. He still can't be considered a dictator, although he can do what he wants, because he enjoys large national support. Now, he being benevolent is a totally different matter cause he's far from it.

___________________
1+1=10

quote:

Originally posted by DJ El Kay Dee lol....good huh??? what good??

turn on the news and quit crticizing. its already started and there isn't a damn thing you or i can do about it. as much as it doesn't seem like it, bush is just trying to kill the Saddam regime and liberate the people of Iraq. The Iraqi people deserve to have freedom and need to stop being cheated out of their money. Saddam pockets the millions or even billions of dollars Iraq makes from oil. It should be spent for the people considering that there basically is no middle class of Iraq and they are all poor. Bush may not be doing it the right way, but he's trying. Saddam has had plenty of time to disarm or whatever but he refuses which resulted in war.