|
Re: Re: Kamikaze attacks
| quote: | Originally posted by Yoepus
This is not true, they are not kamakazis for the following reason:
The Japanese "suicide bombers" were clearly identifiable military targets and person. A plane with Japanese marking is clearly your enemy. Compare that to the low-life Iraqis;
A suicide bomber is a camofluged civilian that abuses the protections granted to him in war time. Their Bombers, are "military vehicles" disguised as "taxis" with a civilian driver apparently. One can not compare the two, so I ask you this, how come it is only the middle east culture that breads such low lifes? How come we do not see such things wide-stream throughout history and across the world?
I refer you to my previous thesis if you do not recall; which percludes that suicide bombing is a islamo-facisit (I just like that word ) trend; http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...&threadid=83110
And it is a terrorist act because they abuse their war protections, and cause terror into enemy soldiers which can only be returned upon civilian targets. If he is not a terrorist what is he? We can not call him a military unit as he does not identify himself as such, what is he then? |
Hey asshole,
I may reading this wrong, but if you're saying that the middle east breeds low-lives then i will fly myself over to Hick-ville and kick your fuckin hillbilly ass. I happen to be from the Middle East, and fuckin nobody disses it. You want to diss muslims and arabs, go ahead, but my country (lebanon, whihc is neither 100% muslim or arab in anyway) is in the middle east has done a SHITLOAD of things for this world, liek creating the UN charter. Again, I'm probably reading this wrong, but if i'm not then you've got another fuckin thing coming
|