Tell me you think those guys are not lying or covering up information about 9/11 so I can laugh at you again.
Apr-27-2009 20:49
Krypton
83.798 g/6.022x10^23
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
quote:
Originally posted by culorut In law, treason is the crime that covers some of the more serious acts of disloyalty to one's sovereign or nation.
Tell us then how you believe that Cheney specifically is not a war criminal after knowing that he lied to go to war while profiteering and using his own people (thousands dead) to do the job.
Over nothing.
If that is not treason you need to check your head.
No, this is treason. Read Article III Section 3 of the United States Constitution...
"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."
Now that you hopefully know what treason is as defined by the constitution, nobody in the Bush Administration, as of yet (bc you don't have any evidence), can be charged with treason. You'r more than welcome to work towards that goal or continue to pointlessly argue with me here over the internet.
Apr-27-2009 20:49
Krypton
83.798 g/6.022x10^23
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
lol, hurling Youtube videos at us again...
It's common knowledge the lies about Iraq. But you are accusing the government of treason. A completely different issue and crime. Stop linking the two.
Apr-27-2009 20:51
culorut
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: right here
The enemy is Cheney and no two witnesses is exactly the problem. You know yourself that they committed war crimes because of the bullshit WMD's in Iraq but I do not see you wanting to testify anytime soon.
It's not that black and white.
Apr-27-2009 20:53
yukii
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2008
Location:
Okay, we get it- no one is arguing with you over the bullshit on Iraq & WMD- So because Cheney, Bush, etc, lied about WMD- now we have to believe they also lied about 9/11? Because they are prone to lying right? Because one accusation was true, doesn't make the other as well..
Apr-27-2009 20:56
Krypton
83.798 g/6.022x10^23
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
The enemy is Cheney and no two witnesses is exactly the problem. You know yourself that they committed war crimes because of the bullshit WMD's in Iraq but I do not see you wanting to testify anytime soon.
It's not that black and white.
The enemy is Cheney? And I am a witness? Stop, please.
Apr-27-2009 20:57
culorut
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: right here
quote:
Originally posted by yukii
Okay, we get it- no one is arguing with you over the bullshit on Iraq & WMD- So because Cheney, Bush, etc, lied about WMD- now we have to believe they also lied about 9/11? Because they are prone to lying right? Because one accusation was true, doesn't make the other as well..
The problem you have with that argument is that their record is a little shaky to say the least. Billions made over war crimes (that can be prosecuted as treason) and yet you are still trying to convince yourself they were being honest about 9/11?
Apr-27-2009 21:03
culorut
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: right here
quote:
Originally posted by Krypton
The enemy is Cheney? And I am a witness? Stop, please.
Well apparently this same war criminal was running the country you live in. You agree that he lied and took the country to a bullshit war for his own agenda but yet you are on a message board defending the same people who lied about 9/11.
Who looks stupid now?
Apr-27-2009 21:05
Krypton
83.798 g/6.022x10^23
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Well apparently this same war criminal was running the country you live in. You agree that he lied and took the country to a bullshit war for his own agenda but yet you are on a message board defending the same people who lied about 9/11.
Lol, first, you didn't know how treason is defined by our constitution. Second, you said Cheney was the enemy. Then, you said I am a witness to your accusation that Cheney is a traitor. Did I miss anything?
You want to charge him with war crimes? Fine, there is plenty of evidence for that. You want to charge him with treason? Go ahead. Your case will be dropped on the first day in court. You have no evidence of treason by anyone.
That's all I'm asking. After 8 years, I would have thought you truthers would have already brought an indictment of treason before a court. I'm not surprised that none of you have. Why don't you call up Alex Jones and ask him why?
quote:
Who looks stupid now?
lol, you shouldn't be allowed to ask that question...
Apr-27-2009 21:12
yukii
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2008
Location:
But that's my point- I don't assume & go straight to conclusions based on someone's shaky track record. I just want facts.
I could care less if he was a war criminal or was brought up by Mother Theresa- I just don't care or see how someone's past decisions have to influence whether an accusation is true or false. If that were the case, then I guess when I leave my house I can't trust any one! Because we've all said a lie at one point of our lives. It's just dumb logic.
Plus, I have no reason to defend Bush, Cheney, or any of those low lifes because I don't like them in the first place. So we're not defending anyone and looking ignorant because we defend war criminals. We just don't agree with 9/11 having been a conspiracy.
And I am a witness? 
