|
| quote: | Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
Also, and I don't know why I'm trying to help you, your use of pronouns is completely counterproductive. The ever-elusive "they" doesn't help substantiate any of your claims.
Your story, as best as I can comprehend it, seems to be this:
"Back in the 1980s, the CIA created al-Qaeda to commit terrorist acts against the United States, because they felt that the constant security threat to the United States would make it inevitable that the government would pay money to defense contractors for more weapons. This culminated in the framing of Muslim hijackers on 9/11, when in reality the government shot down United 93, launched a missile into the side of the Pentagon, and used thermite bombs to bring down the World Trade Center. This can be proved because they evidently tipped off the owner of the World Trade Center, who bought a better insurance policy after real Islamics' attempt at blowing up the buildings in 1993.
Then, and this is where it gets good, the global conspiracy to create one world government created a group called PNAC to carry on the standard of old groups like the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Bilderberg Group - organizations with completely different mandates, but all secretly doing work on ending national sovereignty and creating one New World Order.
PNAC's guilt can be seen by the fact that they warned the US wasn't ready for an attack, and would be caught off guard like a "new Pearl Harbor." They advocated increased American security activity abroad, which should be overlooked since it doesn't fit in with their greater mission of integrating the world under one government.
Also, every single person in government is in on this conspiracy, as are most of the academics, journalists, and policy analysts that compose some of these groups and who try to keep us dumb by giving fake news stories and suppressing the real ones (but believe me, I can tell the true from the fake!).
I don't have any proof for any of this, and I don't even realize that most of it wouldn't even be plausible when taken into consideration with some of the rest.
And if you don't believe all of that after what I told you, then either you CAN'T READ or you are IGNORANT and a SHEEPLE to the MEDIA!!"
Is that about right?
Because congratulations, after all these pages of ramblings, that's the entirety of what I've gleaned from your argument.
No names, no facts, nothing but unsubstantiated rambling. |
___________________
|
