 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
yukii
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Dec 2008
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
LOL, honest last administration? Never use honest in the same sentence with the last administration if you want to be taken seriously.
The problem is you and some others place these war criminals on too high of a peddle stool when you should be dissecting them. Especially given that nothing adds up in their official conspiracy theory regarding 9/11.
I never lied, omitted and covered up anything but they obviously did.
Closed doors and would not testify alone in front of the commissioners? Sure they were telling the truth. |
FFS!! I don't get you!!!
UGHGDSLkfjlkdfjff... the frustration.
You believe just because the administration lied about things here and there (I know they lied about *SERIOUS* things) but fucking seriously now that means that they had a nice tea party and decided they wanted to have a conspiracy party on 9/11?!?!
It's like, you believe they can't do one damn thing 'right' just because they did something like lie about WMD. Not to mention I know you wanted to start a thread on how swine flu is ANOTHER conspiracy.
But honestly, if this is your ideology, then I recommend for you to go see a physician because you might have one of those mental illnesses where you think they're out to get you.
FUCK the last administration, war criminals, Cheney, Bush, EVERYONE.
I don't care about them and I'm not defending them but seriously, I put war criminals on a peddle stool? You have to be kidding me.. 
|
|
Apr-30-2009 03:28
|
|
|
 |
 |
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion

Registered: Jul 2002
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
without people like us there would be no debate |
Denialism: the employment of rhetorical tactics to give the appearance of argument or legitimate debate, when in actuality there is none. These false arguments are used when one has few or no facts to support one's viewpoint against a scientific consensus or against overwhelming evidence to the contrary. They are effective in distracting from actual useful debate using emotionally appealing, but ultimately empty and illogical assertions.
Examples of common topics in which Denialists employ their tactics include: Creationism/Intelligent Design, Global Warming Denialism, Holocaust Denial, HIV/AIDS Denialism, 9/11 conspiracies, tobacco carcinogenecity denialism (the first organized corporate campaign), anti-vaccination/mercury autism denialism and anti-animal testing/animal rights extremist denialism. Denialism spans the ideological spectrum, and is about tactics rather than politics or partisanship.
We believe there are five simple guidelines for identifying denialist arguments. Most denialist arguments will incorporate more than one of the following tactics: Conspiracy, Selectivity, False Experts, Impossible Expectations/Moving Goalposts, and Argument from Metaphor/violations of informal logic.
you keep going cretinrot!!
___________________
|
|
Apr-30-2009 04:01
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:15.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|