|
| quote: | Originally posted by shaolin_Z
I feel more sorry for the vast majority of the family members of the victims that are part of the 9-11 truth movement, because the goverment can't give an honest answer (which is a huge understatement). I guess eyewitness accounts and accounts from people like William Rodriquez, who were rescuing people from the buildings before they collapsed, all talking about bombs going off in the buildings is irrelevant? And I guess whistle blowers from the intelligence agencies (amonsts other federal agencies, not just in the US btw) such as CIA analyst Ray McGovern, who briefed to Regan/Bush administrations, amongst many others, who all agree that the official story is a whitewas and are pretty sure it was a false flag operation also have no credibility or understanding of how things work right?
Or maybe I am to deny my knowledge of physics and believe the official pancake theory, or defy common sense and accept the official conspiracy theory presented by the goverment which has the weakest supporting evidence (and even the official FEMA report concluded had a very unlikely probibility, and it was the only hypothesis they cosidered, I wonder why?). Isn't it convenitent that they ILLEGALY got rid of all of the evidence (i.e. melted majority the steel and sold it to China)? BTW, Prof Steven Jones, a reputable BYU physics Prof, found themate in samples from the steel support beams. That's signature controlled demolition explosives. (You would know that if you've done you're research, which I doubt you have).
|
oh shaolin, im so disappointed in you  
look, as im not a structural engineer i dont feel as though im all that qualified to critique all the evidence. all im saying is the debunking sites ive read are more compelling than the conspiracy sites. if youre going to tow the conspiracy line, imo you need to provide more of an analysis, i think the conspiracy arguments ask questions, but ignore the massive gaping wounds in logic that exist.
the only argument im willing to accept at this stage is that the US government were complicit in allowing the attacks to happen. to suggest otherwise youd have to suggest the government pre-planted explosives at the exact spot just below where the planes hit, and thats just not credible.
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
That is not something you can expect him to do every post has to do with attacks nothing else.
I don't see why people don't get it. Three thousand Americans to the government means nothing to them as the millions of dollars they can make from declaring a war I don't get why people don't understand that. |
ive been posting in the PDD well before you turned up so dont try and label me as anything child. i show a great deal of respect for the regular users in here that present well-constructed arguments. i attack you coz youre stupid, your spelling & grammar is terrible, the 'arguments' you present are laughable and generally reading your posts are a waste of time.
oh, and please tell me exactly how the american government is making 'millions and millions' of dollars from any war. this is what im talking about- you have no understanding of virtually anything youre talking about. go back to school or at least pick up a book. honestly, im embarrassed for you.
___________________
|
