|
| quote: | Originally posted by OrangestO
With more and more people starting to question and oppose the government |
I thought this rather implied that dissatisfaction with the government was a burgeoning phenomenon, but I did kind of take it out of context with the rest of what you said.
And although you're totally correct that the internet has enabled people to project their stupidity all over the place, I think it has just as well offered an opportunity to debunk the self-appraised debunkers, and likewise offer a platform for rebuttal that did not exist before. Of course, there's no convincing the true conspiracy theorists, but like pkc said, 99% of them are absolutely impotent, cellar fungus that has no interest in revealing the truth about things, but a fetish for veiling their own ignorance (to which no one is truly innocent of anyway) with the chaff of convoluted allegations of the authorities that be (and even ones that don't 'be').
In essence, the internet just makes it easier to drop innocuous little 'Obama is NWO, Fema camps, chem trails, etc' remarks that were probably just as prevalent a neurosis among people as they've always been; but works like King Kill 33 are still going to be an overwhelming exception, despite the unprecedented potential for dispersal that did not exist in a more cellular time.
I get the kind of hopelessness that each election seems to elicit in people, but I don't subscribe to the internet merely being a disinformation stream. It seems to me that, for the first time ever, the widest opportunity for every person to research and inform themselves on certain topics is present in most every home in the US, and although it can be rather dismaying that many people do not utilize its capabilities (again, no one is innocent here) in this manner, it's certainly preferable to the alternative: the television feed that facilitated elections for decades prior.
Last edited by Halcyon+On+On on Jan-15-2013 at 15:32
|