|
^^^Better yet; Prove viable motive as to WHY our government would want to perpetuate this supposed crime? One that stands up before a jury of your peers, just as has to be done in a court of law.
There is a reason Jurors are instructed to find someone guilty "beyond a REASONABLE doubt", because if every absurd hypothesis were to be entertained in every case where a crime has been committed, then NO ONE would EVER be convicted of anything! It's a sound system, and it's fair, because at some point, after all the "he said/she said", you have to use COMMON SENSE to deduce the truth! Each side has it's version...common sense is what decides who's right, and who's either lying, or just plain delusional!
The reasonable doubt in this case is simple;
1.) Could some secret faction of the U.S. government (and mind you, it would have to be a large group of people involved) perpetuate this crime and get away with it, without there being ANY dissent amongst those ordered to do it? (i.e., Kill their fellow Americans, for what? A pay-check? Please...)
2.) The supposed motive for faking 9-11 (or at the very least, for helping it along) is so that the U.S. would have a reason to invade Iraq. But we didn't need one! The U.S. already said that they thought there were WMD's in Iraq. So why go through a war in Afgan., just to get to Iraq? Why not say that Iraq attacked us and go directly after them, all things being equal in this supposed game of making up lies and reasons to attack another nation?
And if the U.S. Government somehow supposedly KNEW that there were no WMD's in Iraq (which MANY people around the world seem to believe), why would we put ourselves through the misery of saying that there were, only to incur world wrath? When we, as the supposed sneaky, lying perpetrators of our own 9-11, could JUST as easily have PLANTED some WMD's in Iraq once we invaded, and thus, save face...and a LOT of grief from the rest of the world!?
3.) It is UNIVERSALLY agreed by UBL and his supporters, including many Muslims throughout the world, that AQ took full responsibility for 9-11. I think if they believed for a SECOND that the U.S. somehow helped them perpetuate it, they'd be saying it by now!
4.) Anyone who would have been involved in such a conspiracy could certainly come forward and be the biggest whistle-blower in U.S. history! Why would they not do it if they existed?
You all keep arguing the details of "could the building have been blown up or not?", when by using "reasonable doubt", you can plainly see that the question itself is moot and implausible!!
Eesh...
Hi Pakistani Raisin! Long time, no see!  lol
___________________
The thing about money? It makes you do things that you don't want to do
Last edited by donnybrasco on Dec-13-2007 at 10:43
|
