quote:

Originally posted by DaveSaenz This is on the back of a European vinyl cover: "Unauthorised copying, hiring, lending, public perfomance of this record prohibited."

Live performances hellooooooooooooooooooooooo not things on CD or vinyl.
Keep talking about things that are copyrighted, etc, all you want. That's nothing to do with what I was originally discussing until Neo decided to confuse my discussion of livesets with filesharing and copyrights and brought it up, but that's cool. Enjoy repeating yourselves.

And for the last time, I have no problem with the mods, the rules of the forum, or the idea of keeping this place separate from filesharing, so take it out on someone who's actually breaking those rules.

Nice try putting all that rubbish on me though.

It's a good thing I'm a nice guy who is patient with those who misunderstand something I wrote, otherwise I might be scared off or pissed off about how incredibly off-the-wall some of the responses in this thread are.

I love it when people notice a couple key words in my post, assume they know what I'm trying to say, and go off on a tear about copyrights and filesharing, etc, without even realizing I'm not disagreeing with them nor am I even talking about that.

Peace and goodnight.

Last edited by JRock on Sep-11-2003 at 23:40

Have to agree with the majority here, livesets still fall under copyright

What do you think livesets comprise of?

Ochestra A playing As the rush comes in b minor with Ochestra B mixing in their live version of Darren Tate vs Jono Grant - Nocturnal Creatures?

Obviously sarcasm there - But livesets are comprised of vinyls and cd's so the copyright is still in place no matter what you preach

Also the fact, nightclubs have to fork out a hefty amount for a licence to play music out as a public performance shows that it aint exempt from copyrighting laws

As for people going off on one? Well like many have said, a PM would have been sufficent. Noticing key words in the post, people read what you have posted and form a discussion there, if you didnt want other factors of this sensitive topic to go off, why put in the key words?

he shows...he is not brillant.

Lot of people talking out their butts in this thread. Research copyright law imo, then look up how it's been and is being enforced. There's a bit of a stark difference (in the US at least). Lot's of things are illegal in this country that I and you people do anyway, so I don't know why you're all so eager to throw Jrock to the wolves.

As far as not being able to find much on file sharing via this forum, appearently the "search" button eludes a few...

quote:

Originally posted by joeh152 Explain to me your logic. It is illegal to share singles. So, how woud it become legal for you take 5 singles and use them in a mix, and then share that mix? People openly talking about illegal file sharing is threatening TA's future. There's no need to mention it, unless of course you want TA closed, and ill assume you do .

because the music is mixed thus not in its original form i think it is not applicable to copyright laws because the song would be different if you cut it out from the mix. thus eveerytime you mix two tunes you make a different song a bit like a bootleg, you still cant sell them obviously tho.

___________________
Fave Tune at the Moment: Mesmerizer - Taking Control

>>> Download my mix here <<< (Electro, Techno & Psy-Trance)

quote:

Originally posted by JRock Live performances hellooooooooooooooooooooooo not things on CD or vinyl. Keep talking about things that are copyrighted, etc, all you want. That's nothing to do with what I was originally discussing until Neo decided to confuse my discussion of livesets with filesharing and copyrights and brought it up, but that's cool. Enjoy repeating yourselves.

do you think the DJ's whistle the tunes..?

filesharing has everything to do with copyright. thats why its illegal to fileshare.

livesets are in essence illegal but as far as the law goes it is not quite so stringent regarding them, as many artists (note: not the DJs, what the DJ thinks doesnt really matter when he is playing other peoples music) do regard them as very good promotion. but at the end of the day, its still filesharing and its still not allowed on trancEaddict.

as this thread is a completely pointless waste of neo's time if he were to come and read it, ill close it now.

get a clue.

___________________
MUGGETS

Last edited by tu_face on Sep-12-2003 at 08:38

I think the Mods here have basicly told you all what I would have said so good work all

The laws regarding copyright are very complicated, some rules you can bend, some can be broken without fear of being brought up in some court etc but the point is that the RIAA and other bodies for different countries will always use examples like that to proove the case to stop all types of filesharing.
We all know it happens and the majority of us participate in filesharing but Swamper and the Mods of TA have decided that filesharing is not to be encouraged on the forums here so threads of that nature will be closed / deleted as seen fit by the mods of TA.

___________________
My Mixcloud Profile My Twitch Channel

then why share tracks/livesets in the main page? doesn't make sense to me.

___________________
www.arturobonetti.com // www.giuseppeottaviani.com

because its not illegal

___________________
MUGGETS