 |
|
|
|
 |
DaveSZ
When The Levee Breaks

Registered: Jan 2003
Location: ATX
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Arbiter
The answer makes too much sense for any politician to embrace.
Marriage:
-Recognized by church only, not by the state in any way.
-Man+Woman
Civil Union:
-Recognized by the government.
-No restrictions of subjective origin.
|
That's what I've been saying too, though in a less succinct manner.
FFS if even Mexico can get it right...
You and I both know that marriage and civil unions will never be separated as they should be though. 
Rosie O is getting hitched:
http://www.foxnews.com/printer_frie...,112603,00.html
| quote: |
Rosie O'Donnell Plans to Wed Girlfriend
Thursday, February 26, 2004
SAN FRANCISCO — Rosie O'Donnell (search) flew across the country Thursday to marry her longtime girlfriend in the city where more than 3,300 other same-sex couples have tied the knot since Feb. 12.
The couple traveled to San Francisco from New York on Thursday morning, said Cindi Berger, O'Donnell's publicist. They have a 1 p.m. appointment to pick up a marriage license, according to the mayor's office.
"We, too, have a dream of equality for all families," the comedian and former talk show host said in a statement. "The only way changes are made in society is when people like Mayor Gavin Newsom have the courage to stand up against injustice."
City officials didn't know who O'Donnell wants to officiate when she marries her girlfriend, Kelli Carpenter (search), said Francisco Castillo, a spokesman for the mayor. The women plan to take their vows on the steps of City Hall, according to Berger.
Earlier Thursday, O'Donnell announced her wedding plans on ABC's "Good Morning America," just two days after President Bush (search) called for a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage.
She said the president's call is what inspired her to come to San Francisco, where city officials continue to perform same-sex weddings even as state courts are considering the legality of those marriages.
"I think the actions of the president are, in my opinion, the most vile and hateful words ever spoken by a sitting president," O'Donnell said on the program. "I am stunned and I'm horrified.
"I find this proposed amendment very, very, very, very shocking. And immoral. And, you know, if civil disobedience is the way to go about change, then I think a lot of people will be going to San Francisco. And I hope they put more people on the steps to marry as many people as show up. And I hope everyone shows up."
O'Donnell said she decided to marry Carpenter, a former dancer and marketing director at Nickelodeon, during her recent trial in New York over the now-defunct Rosie magazine. During the case, she referred to Carpenter as her wife.
"We applied for spousal privilege and were denied it by the state. As a result, everything that I said to Kelli, every letter that I wrote her, every e-mail, every correspondence and conversation was entered into the record," O'Donnell said. "After the trial, I am now and will forever be a total proponent of gay marriage."
|
___________________
http://www.discoboomer.com/forums/
|
|
Feb-26-2004 19:00
|
|
|
 |
 |
occrider
Traveladdict

Registered: Oct 2000
Location: New York
|
|
|
Re: eh
| quote: | Originally posted by hardstyle
Ok if you laughin at my theory then tell me why people was born to be gay ?
Becouse if heterosexuality is normal then i guess homosexuality is not normal . Then it has to do something with birt deffect, or i might be wrong |
Well it's not your theory that being gay might have something to do with genetics, I myself beleive that. It's your presentation of that theory that was completely wrong. First, the x chromosome is the female chromosome and the y chromosome is the male. Secondly, all humans have 22 numbered pairs of chromosomes plus 2 sex chromosomes. Any more or less would probably not be very human. So one cannot simply "add" chromosomes.
Furthermore, your characterization of being gay as a chromosomal "birth defect" is also incorrect. Being gay has never been considered a chromosomal abnormality since deletion, duplication or rearrangement of a chromosome region big enough to include two or more contiguous genes does not take place. If one were to consider it a disorder at all, if anything, it would be a multifactorial disorder involving multiple genes and environmental factors. So you see, it is not a "defect" comparable to blindness, mental retardation, etc.
___________________
Retro ...
|
|
Feb-26-2004 19:19
|
|
|
 |
 |
MisterOpus1
Grumpy Old Fart

Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Kansas City
|
|
|
Re: eh
| quote: | Originally posted by hardstyle
Ok if you laughin at my theory then tell me why people was born to be gay ?
Becouse if heterosexuality is normal then i guess homosexuality is not normal . Then it has to do something with birt deffect, or i might be wrong |
Perhaps your choice of using the phrase "birth defect" may be a little off, but the cause of both homosexuality and birth defects may be similar - mutations, or might be something completely different - studies showing hormone levels in prenatal growth stages attributing homosexual behavior.
And then, of course, there's also the possibility of environmental influences (i.e. nurture).
The truth is, we don't know exactly the cause, though recent studies have suggested natural causes are likely more influental than nurtural factors on later behaviors.
___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...
|
|
Feb-26-2004 19:21
|
|
|
 |
 |
nic01445
Was guckst du?
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: HERE AND NOW
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by trancepixie17
** Galapidate, I do see where you are comming from with the "divorce is a violation of marriage too." Yet, I believe, correct me though if I am wrong, divorce is only a violation under Catholicism...only the Catholic church believes that?!!!? |
not quite. Marriage, according to the church, is also an oath sworn between two people of different sex. So to divorce is to break that oath, which violates the premise of marriage.
You are sort of right about catholicism. Catholics are the only branch of christianity that openly opposes and does not allow divorce.
But, even if it is only the catholics that shun divorce, divorce is still in violation of oath sworn in marriage.
|
|
Feb-29-2004 17:47
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 21:08.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|