Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > Explosives disappear...
Pages (11): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
occrider
Traveladdict



Registered: Oct 2000
Location: New York

quote:
Originally posted by speedracer_mec
Can you compare the ease of mobility of the these explosives with the mobility of actual WMDs?
And the whereabouts of the U.N.


What are you talking about? It doesn't matter what is being moved, it matters the amount that is being moved. The US was fully aware of the importance of that dump site, and most certainly were monitoring it with predator drones or satellites to see if WMDs were being deployed to Iraqi troops ... at least if they were competant. Are you telling me the US was completely oblivious to over 300 tons of something being moved from a major weapons depo a week before the invasion? At a time when we had special forces, UAVs, and satellites busy preparing for the invasion?

quote:

You liberals need to make up your mind.

Did Saddam have weapons or not?

You are arguing that there NEVER WERE weapons and now want to argue that we let them be stolen.


You're kidding me right? Are you so dumb that you can't distinguish between a weapon of mass destruction from normal weapons such as explosives? This is getting pedantic but I'll humor you. No Saddam did NOT have weapons of mass destruction which was the reason given to invade Iraq. Yes Saddam HAS weapons such as explosives which the Pentagon allowed to be stolen. Is that simple enough to understand?

quote:

How about picking a side and sticking to it... You are flip-flopping as much as your dishonorable candidate.


Speedracer, I've addressed every single supposed "flip-flopping" case that you've raised. I even went one further and addressed the flip-flopping cases that Q5Echo raised. Not you nor anyone else has rebutted a single one of my arguments with respect to flip-flopping ... not to mention addressed any one of the bush flip-flops myself or countless others have pointed out. Until you do so (and please let me know if you want me to provide the links) I'll simply assume that you like to talk a lot of shit without substantiating your arguments.

quote:

Lexis-Nexis

and
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,83252,00.html

Also something smells fishy with the Kerry camp and the liberal media, come to mind CBS and the New York Times


Ummm I just posted a similar article above. If you had bothered to post the entire article rather than use a misleading clip, you will notice that the VERY next paragraph states:

quote:

Col. John Peabody, engineer brigade commander of the 3rd Infantry Division, said troops found thousands of five-centimetre by 12-centimetre boxes, each containing three vials of white powder, together with documents written in Arabic that dealt with how to engage in chemical warfare.

A senior U.S. official familiar with initial testing said the powder was believed to be explosives. The finding would be consistent with the plant's stated production capabilities in the field of basic raw materials for explosives and propellants.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/n...readiness01.htm


quote:


This was in the SECOND Debate, October 8th.

NBC reported on the 380 tons missing when we arrived on October 10th.

CBS/NYT spun/faked this news to imply the cache was there and just disappeared a few days ago (FALSE). This report was on October 25th.

CBS planned to run their story on October 31st to alter the election.


Why is Kerry claiming we lost 850,000 TONS of ammo? 850,000?????

Where did he get this information two days before any report of the missing explosives?
Kerry was talking about being attacked by missing ammo during the debates. His characterization mirrors the NYT/CBS propaganda piece too closely for my comfort. He must have known the story was going to run, and/or either slipped up. Info on this dump had not been packaged this way yet. Kerry WAS privy to the upcoming story.
Who thought NBC would have the integrity to blow the whistle on this refitted non-story? Not me.

Ridiculous shit to say the least


Actually there have been well publicized incidents of raids against unguarded ammo dumps in the past. Incidents such as unguarded nuclear facilities with tons of nuclear material were published a year ago:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/w...35498-2003Apr24

As for Kerry's exact figure. I'm not entirely certain where he got the figure. However, there have been plenty of coalition authority briefings done where the CPA has specifically addressed the issue of security at ammo dumps:

quote:

Q Hi, general, Mark Stone (sp), ABC News. Two very quick questions, if I may. David Kay is giving a closed-session briefing today back in the States regarding the weapons of mass destruction. Can you give us any update here on whether anything has been found, or what's happening there?

Second question is regarding the ammunition dumps around the country, and whether they are secure. I think the Pentagon was saying that, yes, they are secure. Another of your colleagues said that there was no way you could secure them. Can you give us any updates on whether they are secure, and if they aren't whether there's any evidence that weapons from these ammo dumps have been used to attack your forces?

GEN. SANCHEZ: First of all, on David Kay's report, I think it's probably best for all of us to wait and see what David Kay says when he publishes his report later on today.

On the ammunition dumps, I think we've made it very clear that there's so much ammunition in this country that you can't guard it all. There are over 650,000 tons of ammunition in this country, and it is -- you know, if you ask me could some of that ammunition possibly been used against my forces? Of course it's possible. And are they all guarded? No, they're not. Are they -- do we have measures in place to provide some measure of security? Of course we do. We have put up berms against all of these -- or a lot of these ammunition dumps. We have put up patrolling sequences that we conduct, both aerial and ground. We conduct security operations around them. When we find looters, we engage or arrest them. But it's a physical impossibility when you think in terms of the numbers of ammunition dumps that are out there. We find them every day. Every single day we are finding more. You have ammo dumps out there that are 15 kilometers by 15 kilometers. To physically guard every single bunker is impossible. And I'm not going to stand up here and tell you that every one of those is guarded.
http://www.cpa-iraq.org/transcripts...chez-Brief.html


This was in 2003. Considering Sanchez himself stated that they were uncovering more ammo dumps every day, it's not unreasonable to assume that they've uncovered a significant greater quantity of ammunition since then and considering troop levels haven't increased it's further not far off the mark to assume that many of these new sites are not adequately guarded.


___________________
Retro ...

Old Post Oct-27-2004 05:23  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for occrider Click here to Send occrider a Private Message Add occrider to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
speedracer_mec
DeepHouse & Progressive



Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Greece, where the good progressive comes from.

quote:
Originally posted by occrider
What are you talking about? It doesn't matter what is being moved, it matters the amount that is being moved. The US was fully aware of the importance of that dump site, and most certainly were monitoring it with predator drones or satellites to see if WMDs were being deployed to Iraqi troops ... at least if they were competant. Are you telling me the US was completely oblivious to over 300 tons of something being moved from a major weapons depo a week before the invasion? At a time when we had special forces, UAVs, and satellites busy preparing for the invasion?



You're kidding me right? Are you so dumb that you can't distinguish between a weapon of mass destruction from normal weapons such as explosives? This is getting pedantic but I'll humor you. No Saddam did NOT have weapons of mass destruction which was the reason given to invade Iraq. Yes Saddam HAS weapons such as explosives which the Pentagon allowed to be stolen. Is that simple enough to understand?



Speedracer, I've addressed every single supposed "flip-flopping" case that you've raised. I even went one further and addressed the flip-flopping cases that Q5Echo raised. Not you nor anyone else has rebutted a single one of my arguments with respect to flip-flopping ... not to mention addressed any one of the bush flip-flops myself or countless others have pointed out. Until you do so (and please let me know if you want me to provide the links) I'll simply assume that you like to talk a lot of shit without substantiating your arguments.



Ummm I just posted a similar article above. If you had bothered to post the entire article rather than use a misleading clip, you will notice that the VERY next paragraph states:





Actually there have been well publicized incidents of raids against unguarded ammo dumps in the past. Incidents such as unguarded nuclear facilities with tons of nuclear material were published a year ago:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/w...35498-2003Apr24

As for Kerry's exact figure. I'm not entirely certain where he got the figure. However, there have been plenty of coalition authority briefings done where the CPA has specifically addressed the issue of security at ammo dumps:



This was in 2003. Considering Sanchez himself stated that they were uncovering more ammo dumps every day, it's not unreasonable to assume that they've uncovered a significant greater quantity of ammunition since then and considering troop levels haven't increased it's further not far off the mark to assume that many of these new sites are not adequately guarded.

With all of that, the fact still remains that nobody has seen a IAEA seal at that place since well before the war.

Kerry is left with the convincing argument that Bush COULD have been careless in his war prep IF the place was looted after April 10.

Kerry should have known not to trust the New York Times. They make stuff up. Check out some information on the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Mohamed ElBaradei I dug up and you'll see some interesting scary facts about him. Up this page.

Old Post Oct-27-2004 05:55 
Click Here to See the Profile for speedracer_mec Click here to Send speedracer_mec a Private Message Add speedracer_mec to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
speedracer_mec
DeepHouse & Progressive



Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Greece, where the good progressive comes from.

ANTI-GUN KERRY

FACT: Kerry co-sponsors a bill that would ban all semi-automatic shotguns and detachable-magazine semi-automatic rifles, a gigantic step toward bringing Australian-style gun control to the U.S.1
1. Signed on as co-sponsor of S. 1431 on Nov. 21, 2003.

FACT: Kerry says, "I think you ought to tax all ammunition, personally, I think you ought to tax guns."2

2.CNN "Late Edition," Nov. 7, 1993

FACT: Kerry has voted nine times in favor of banning semi-auto firearms.3.

3.Vote No. 24, March 2, 2004; Vote No. 295, Aug. 25, 1994; Vote No. 294, Aug. 25, 1994; Vote No. 293, Aug. 25, 1994; Vote No. 375, Nov. 17, 1993; Vote No. 365, Nov. 9, 1993; Vote No. 133, June 28, 1990; Vote No. 103, May 23, 1990; Vote No. 102, May 23, 1990.

FACT: Kerry has voted for a Ted Kennedy amendment to ban most center-fire rifle ammunition, including the most common rounds used by hunters and target shooters.4

4. Vote No. 28, March 2, 2004.

FACT: Kerry has voted to close off hundreds of thousands of acres of the California Mojave Desert to hunting.5

5. Vote No. 87, April 12, 1994.

FACT:Kerry has voted to hold the highly regulated American firearms industry legally responsible for the illegal acts of violent criminals.6

6. Vote No. 24, March 2, 2004; Vote No. 25, March 2, 2004 ("poison pill" amendments).

FACT: Kerry was one of only 18 Senators to oppose the Firearms Owners` Protection Act, which ended alarming abuses being committed under the 1968 Gun Control Act.7

7. Vote No. 142, July 9, 1985.

FACT:Kerry was one of only 29 Senators to vote to prohibit gun manufacturers from discharging debts created by the reckless lawsuits filed by municipalities.8

8. Vote No. 4, Feb. 2, 2000.

FACT:Kerry has voted to allow BATF to conduct unlimited warrantless inspections of FFL holders.9

9. Vote No. 140, July 9, 1985.

FACT: Kerry has voted to criminalize legal sales between private individuals at gun shows.10

10. Vote No. 134, May 20, 1999; Vote No. 25, March 2, 2004.

FACT: Kerry has voted to impose penalties of a year in prison and a $10,000 fine on an adult if a juvenile steals a firearm from him, and then merely displays it in a public place.11

11. Vote No. 118, May 14, 1999; Vote No. 224, July 22, 1998.

FACT: Kerry has voted to force many small firearms dealers out of business, which would have impacted both the availability and price of guns, particularly in rural areas.12

12. Vote No. 227, July 30, 1993.

FACT: Kerry has voted 11 times to force law-abiding citizens to wait to exercise their Second Amendment rights. He voted to keep the federal waiting period after the National Instant Check System was in place.13

13. Vote No. 141, July 9, 1985; Vote No. 115, June 28, 1991; Vote No. 113, June 28, 1991; Vote No. 278, Nov. 27, 1991; Vote No. 53, Mar. 19, 1992; Vote No. 262, Oct. 2, 1992; Vote No. 385, Nov. 19, 1993; Vote No. 386, Nov. 19, 1993; Vote No. 387, Nov. 19, 1993; Vote No. 390, Nov. 19, 1993; Vote No. 394, Nov. 20, 1993.

FACT: Kerry voted twice to eliminate the Civilian Marksmanship Program.14

14. Vote No. 325 Oct. 12, 1993; Vote No. 178, June 27, 1996.

FACT: Kerry wants to silence gun owners` voices. When NRA sought the same exemption from campaign finance rules that news organizations have, Kerry called that effort "hijacking America`s airwaves."15

15. Vote No. 64, April 2, 2001; "Kerry asks FEC to Block NRA Channel," AP, Dec. 9, 2003.

This is only his Voting Record on Guns.....

With all that said, here we have Kerry







Source?======John Kerry's Senate Record.....Skerry isnt it?

Old Post Oct-27-2004 06:05 
Click Here to See the Profile for speedracer_mec Click here to Send speedracer_mec a Private Message Add speedracer_mec to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Yoepus
Neo-condimist



Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Ketchup fields, Texas

quote:
Originally posted by occrider
Clearly the US blanketed Iraq with aerial surveillance drones as well as satellite coverage in the search for possible WMD sites.


I don't know what you mean 'blanketed'. I don't recall the US having that many surveillance drones in or near Iraq before the war. I don't know exact figures, but I would be suprised if the entire US forces had more than 200 preditaor drones pre-war. The number of spy satilites is fewer, especially those in geo-sync orbit. I don't know, but I suspect that the US had better things to do than watch an empty depot 24/7 with its valuable intelligences eyes.

quote:

They would have clearly took note of large shipments from known major weapons dump that was a likely candidate for nuclear/biological weapons storage. One would like to think that the US was not so stupid as to let the Iraqis reposition all their supplies and bomb empty positions.


OK, let me play devil-advocate here. Assuming you are right, who says the US did not indeed track the large shipments of the weapons and bomb them in transit or at their final destination?

The weapons would still not be accounted for in their original location, but would than have been destroyed in most other circumstances.


quote:

The reporter didn't change her stance.


Was she the only embed? What are the other embeds that were with her saying? As I've mentioned before, I don't believe reporters. But if they're are more than one accounts, I'll be less skeptical.

quote:

The site was inspected a mere week before the invasion and the seals were intact.


This was contradicted by a news report above. Perhaps you'd care to straighten it out?


quote:
The issue is pretty much moot however, since it was clearly reported back in 2003 that troops did indeed find explosives when it occupied the camp


The explosives were there, however the question the media is trying to want to make us ask is where are they now (and surely it is Bush's fault they are there wherever they are now).

quote:

The explosives were there a week before the invasion.


This is speculation. It could, or could not have been there. The article posted above says IAEA didn't find the seals, they were gone.

quote:

US troops did not properly search the facility when they stopped there.


Define US troops?

First we have the 101 Airborne with your embed reporter account saying they didn't stop there.

Than we have a engineer from 3rd Mech telling us in great detail about their search at the facility.. Who are we talking about and what is the timeframe?

quote:
US troops did find explosives at the dump.

If they did find explosives at the dump can you catalog what they found, how much, and how much was undamaged?

Where are you getting this specific information from?

quote:
The Iraqi government said that the explosives were stolen after Saddam was toppled due to poor security.


The Iraq government said the IAEA said... don't place the blame on them Iraqi gov, its IAEA.

quote:

Nothing indicates that the explosives were moved prior to the invasion.


Nothing indicates that all explosives were left there prior to invasion either.

quote:

This isn't a court of justice. This is public relations. If the Pentagon had solid evidence that they were not culpable for this they would present it. Granted it's not sole evidence to support the claims of incompetance, but that along with every other account of events solidify into a rather credible account.


Are you fimilar with the term "no comment"?

quote:

I have politically chosen sides, however, this is hardly political "bias". On a scale, the majority of evidence simply weighs on one side so disproportionately. Therefore my convictions on this matter are simply based on the preponderance of the evidence ... same as it is in every other matter and why I hate conspiracy theories so.


What evidence?

This is witch hunt to find weapons that 'disappeared' during war. Well good fuc*ing luck finding them. I know of a lot of weapons that happened to disappear during war, you think anyone can catalog them all for you? Not even the all-mighty and knowing Pentagon can tell you were ammo-crate #497897 for the 101 Airborne 2nd division is right now, not to mention the ammo-crate if their Iraqi counterparts 2 weeks before the war, and almost 2 years after.

This is a witch hunt clear and simple. They are not looking for missing weapons. They are looking for political gains. If they were to state that weapons go missing in Iraq (all old news), I would have no doubt of the integrity of the reports. But when they are trying to fault for one political reason or another someone for why these weapons are missing, well thats just ridicilous.


___________________
SAVE ZIONIST MUSTARD: BUY ZIONIST KETCHUP!


Click here to support the free mustard alliance.

Old Post Oct-27-2004 06:19  Israel
Click Here to See the Profile for Yoepus Click here to Send Yoepus a Private Message Visit Yoepus's homepage! Add Yoepus to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Yoepus
Neo-condimist



Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Ketchup fields, Texas

quote:
Originally posted by occrider
This was in 2003. Considering Sanchez himself stated that they were uncovering more ammo dumps every day, it's not unreasonable to assume that they've uncovered a significant greater quantity of ammunition since then and considering troop levels haven't increased it's further not far off the mark to assume that many of these new sites are not adequately guarded.


Perhaps, but this is not the point of these weapons-missing allegation. Unfortunately the only point is that these weapons went missing and its all beause of the Pentagon and their rush to war <--- this is a political agenda, a witch hunt for missing weapons in Iraq.

What a world. If you told me a year ago that in the future the democratic or republican party would make up a witch hunt for missing-weapons in Iraq to prove their political agenda so they could win the election, I would not have guessed it would be the democrates.

Also the fact that the US has uncovered such a significantly greater quantity of ammo since than indicates than indeed Iraqs have moved their ammo from known depos and storage to unknown locations that only today are being discovered.


___________________
SAVE ZIONIST MUSTARD: BUY ZIONIST KETCHUP!


Click here to support the free mustard alliance.

Old Post Oct-27-2004 06:22  Israel
Click Here to See the Profile for Yoepus Click here to Send Yoepus a Private Message Visit Yoepus's homepage! Add Yoepus to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
tecnolover
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2004
Location: somewhere in, USA

Honestly Mr. Opus and all you Kerry supporters,

I think right about now you had better be hoping that Kerry doesn't open his dumb mouth again until the election is over. He's just about dug his own grave this time. If it wasn't for all Kerry's Bush hating supporters to dig him out and soften the damage every time, he would have already been six feet under long ago. It must be hard trying to constantly defend your man from his own stupidity. For this I respect your effort even if most of us see right through it.

Kerry's 'October suprise' is really looking like his 'October demise'.

Old Post Oct-27-2004 07:06  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for tecnolover Click here to Send tecnolover a Private Message Add tecnolover to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DrUg_Tit0
e^(i*pi)+1=0



Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Zagreb, Croatia

speedracer, first of all, I would like to ask you if you disagree with Kerry's proposals about gun control? I can't see how you can be for people to have automatic firearms at home. You can allow people to have tanks and fighter jets in their backyards too, but then you shouldn't be surprised when a guy goes wacko and starts launching missiles at his neighbours. Ask yourself why US has the 10 times higher gun murder rate than the rest of civilized world.

Now, your attempt to show Kerry flip flopping is again rediculous and retarded and only capable of decieving idiots. Kerry has not ever stated that he is completely against guns, he has only stated that he is for a tighter gun control. It's like me being for speed limits on highways and then you take a picture of me standing next to my car. Wow. So what have you proved with that? Nothing. Please, your consistent spamming is really irritating, and it's obvious to everyone that you're taking things out of context. Noone really takes you seriously anymore so you might just as well stop.


___________________
1+1=10

Old Post Oct-27-2004 11:16  Croatia
Click Here to See the Profile for DrUg_Tit0 Click here to Send DrUg_Tit0 a Private Message Add DrUg_Tit0 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
speedracer_mec
DeepHouse & Progressive



Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Greece, where the good progressive comes from.

quote:
Originally posted by DrUg_Tit0
Nothing. Please, your consistent spamming is really irritating, and it's obvious to everyone that you're taking things out of context. Noone really takes you seriously anymore so you might just as well stop.




out of context?

its his senate voting record

Funny how you say I ridicule Kerry when I simply state his senate record

Last edited by speedracer_mec on Oct-27-2004 at 12:47

Old Post Oct-27-2004 12:39 
Click Here to See the Profile for speedracer_mec Click here to Send speedracer_mec a Private Message Add speedracer_mec to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
tecnolover
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2004
Location: somewhere in, USA

quote:
Originally posted by DrUg_Tit0
Ask yourself why US has the 10 times higher gun murder rate than the rest of civilized world.



Is that per capita? can you give a source please?

thanx.

Old Post Oct-27-2004 13:18  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for tecnolover Click here to Send tecnolover a Private Message Add tecnolover to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
surferfb
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Berlin, Germany

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...q_us_explosives

Iraq says 'impossible' explosives taken before regime fall
BAGHDAD (AFP) - A top Iraqi science official said it was impossible that 350 tonnes of high explosives could have been smuggled out of a military site south of Baghdad before the regime fell last year.


The UN nuclear watchdog this week said about 350 tonnes of high explosives went missing from a weapons dump some time after Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s regime was toppled in April 2003 after the US-led invasion .


But as the issue of the missing explosives took centre stage in the final days of the US presidential campaign, some US officials have suggested they had gone before the US-led forces moved on Baghdad.


"It is impossible that these materials could have been taken from this site before the regime's fall," said Mohammed al-Sharaa, who heads the science ministry's site monitoring department and previously worked with UN weapons inspectors under Saddam.


"The officials that were inside this facility (Al-Qaqaa) beforehand confirm that not even a shred of paper left it before the fall and I spoke to them about it and they even issued certified statements to this effect which the US-led coalition was aware of."


Sharaa also warned that other nearby sites with similar materials could have also been plundered.


"The Al-Milad Company in Iskandariyah and the Yarmouk and Hateen facilities contained explosive materials that could have also been taken out," the official told AFP in an interview.


The Al-Qaqaa facility is near the town of Latifiyah, 30 kilometers (18 miles) south of Baghdad and the bulk of materials in question include HMX (high melting point explosive) and RDX (rapid detonation explosive), which experts say can be used in major bombing attacks, making missile warheads and detonating nuclear weapons.


The area in Babil province, which includes the towns of Iskandariyah and Mahmudiyah, used to be the centre of Saddam's military-industrial complex.


It is now one of the most dangerous parts of the country rife with crime, kidnappings and attacks. Several headless bodies hav been found in the area, according to marines stationed there.


"It may be already too late to salvage many of these sites, which are controlled by bandits and beyond the control of Iraqi forces," warned Sharaa.


___________________
quote:
Originally posted by davedresden
oh my fucking god i die,
dave

Old Post Oct-27-2004 20:16  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for surferfb Click here to Send surferfb a Private Message Add surferfb to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
occrider
Traveladdict



Registered: Oct 2000
Location: New York

quote:
Originally posted by speedracer_mec
With all of that, the fact still remains that nobody has seen a IAEA seal at that place since well before the war.


This all might be moot considering surferfb's article however, the seals were confirmed a week before the war.

quote:

ANTI-GUN KERRY

FACT: Kerry co-sponsors a bill that would ban all semi-automatic shotguns and detachable-magazine semi-automatic rifles, a gigantic step toward bringing Australian-style gun control to the U.S.1
1. Signed on as co-sponsor of S. 1431 on Nov. 21, 2003.


Goody ... I do actually enjoy these. The bill didn't ban all semi-automatic shotguns and all detachable magazine semi-automatic rifles you ninny. I thought you would have learned your lesson from last time to actually read the bill itself. The bill states that it bans:

quote:

`(C) The following shotguns or copies or duplicates thereof:
`(i) Armscor 30 BG;
`(ii) SPAS 12 or LAW 12;
`(iii) Striker 12; or
`(iv) Streetsweeper.
`(D) A semiautomatic rifle that has an ability to accept a detachable magazine, and that has--
`(i) a folding or telescoping stock;
`(ii) a threaded barrel;
`(iii) a pistol grip;
`(iv) a forward grip; or
`(v) a barrel shroud.
`(E) Except as provided in clause (ii),
`(i) A semiautomatic rifle that has a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds.
`(ii) Clause (i) shall not apply to an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.
`(H) A semiautomatic shotgun that has--
`(i) a folding or telescoping stock;
`(ii) a pistol grip;
`(iii) the ability to accept a detachable magazine; or
`(iv) a fixed magazine capacity of more than 5 rounds.
`(I) A shotgun with a revolving cylinder.
`(L) A semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General. In making the determination, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or any Federal law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a firearm shall not be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event.'.
http://www.ceasefiremd.org/4_NalLeg...n/c_BillBan.htm


So in essence it bans shotguns that have a folding or telescoping stock, a pistol grip, the ability to accept a detachable magazine, or a fixed magazine capacity of more than 5 rounds. An example of such a shotgun looks a little something like this:



In essence, these are military or police issue shotguns and assult rifles. Does that shotgun look anything at all like Kerry's??? Nowhere in the bill does it outlaw ALL shotguns or semi-automatic rifles.

quote:

FACT: Kerry says, "I think you ought to tax all ammunition, personally, I think you ought to tax guns."2

2.CNN "Late Edition," Nov. 7, 1993


Is this some kind of argument??? We have a tax on all food, all medical care, all consumer goods and for some stupid reason we're supposed to get upset over a tax on ammunition and guns??? Please elaborate on why these goods should be tax free while all other goods are not?

quote:

FACT: Kerry has voted nine times in favor of banning semi-auto firearms.3.

3.Vote No. 24, March 2, 2004; Vote No. 295, Aug. 25, 1994; Vote No. 294, Aug. 25, 1994; Vote No. 293, Aug. 25, 1994; Vote No. 375, Nov. 17, 1993; Vote No. 365, Nov. 9, 1993; Vote No. 133, June 28, 1990; Vote No. 103, May 23, 1990; Vote No. 102, May 23, 1990.


These are all bills related to the assault weapons ban and once again they do NOT ban all semi-automatic firearms. They ban firearms with specific extra-lethal characteristics such as high capacity ammunition clips, folding stocks, etc. Now instead of trying to mislead everyone, why don't you go into the specifics of each bill and point out the reasons why the majority of senators should not have voted for them? Oh yea because you're either too lazy or too incompetant to argumentatively defend your position.


quote:

FACT: Kerry has voted for a Ted Kennedy amendment to ban most center-fire rifle ammunition, including the most common rounds used by hunters and target shooters.4

4. Vote No. 28, March 2, 2004.


Hmmm let's look into the bill once again shall we?

quote:

SA 2619. Mr. KENNEDY submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 1805, to prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition for damages resulting from the misuse of their products by others; as follows:


On page 11, after line 19, add the following:

SEC. 5. ARMOR PIERCING AMMUNITION.

(a) EXPANSION OF DEFINITION OF ARMOR PIERCING AMMUNITION.--Section 921(a)(17)(B) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--

(1) in clause (i), by striking ``or'' at the end;

(2) in clause (ii), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and

(3) by adding at the end the following:

``(iii) a projectile that may be used in a handgun and that the Attorney General determines, pursuant to section 926(d), to be capable of penetrating body armor; or

``(iv) a projectile for a centerfire rifle, designed or marketed as having armor piercing capability, that the Attorney General determines, pursuant to section 926(d), to be more likely to penetrate body armor than standard ammunition of the same caliber.''.

(b) DETERMINATION OF THE CAPABILITY OF PROJECTILES TO PENETRATE BODY ARMOR.--Section 926 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

``(d)(1) Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Attorney General shall promulgate standards for the uniform testing of projectiles against Body Armor Exemplar.

``(2) The standards promulgated pursuant to paragraph (1) shall take into account, among other factors, variations in performance that are related to the length of the barrel of the handgun or centerfire rifle from which the projectile is fired and the amount and kind of powder used to propel the projectile.

``(3) As used in paragraph (1), the term `Body Armor Exemplar' means body armor that the Attorney General determines meets minimum standards for the protection of law enforcement officers.''.


Oh my God!!! A ban on ammunition that can penetrate the bullet proof vests that cops wear??? Oh the inhumanity!!!! However shall we hunt??? On to the next asinine argument ...

quote:

FACT: Kerry has voted to close off hundreds of thousands of acres of the California Mojave Desert to hunting.5

5. Vote No. 87, April 12, 1994.


You know what ... I know nothing about any of these votes or anything at all before I research them. Every single time I think I might happen upon a single point where I think to myself, "Damn that's a bad vote ... what was kerry thinking?" But it hasn't happened yet, and this ain't one of them. The 25-million-acre Desert is open to hunting. The bill voted by Kerry designated 1.4-million-acres of that 25 million acres as a nature preserve due to the fragile ecology of that region. The best part is yet to come though:

quote:

As originally written in the California desert legislation, the East Mojave area was going to be redesignated a national park. Opposition to park establishment from hunting organizations like the Safari Club and the National Rifle Association held up the desert bill in Congress. The opposition was based more on principle than genuine concern about the loss of hunting opportunities. Almost no one hunted in the proposed preserve anyway, and the number of game animals is limited to a few hundred deer and bighorn sheep.
http://gorp.away.com/gorp/publisher...fe/his2_moj.htm


Next:

quote:

FACT:Kerry has voted to hold the highly regulated American firearms industry legally responsible for the illegal acts of violent criminals.6

6. Vote No. 24, March 2, 2004; Vote No. 25, March 2, 2004 ("poison pill" amendments).


LOL the bill was intoduced by McCain (R), and co-sponsored by Dewine (R), Chafee (R), and five other democrats. Furthermore, the text of the bill doesn't hold the firearm industry responsible for illegal acts by violent criminals, it sets regulations for gunshow loopholes and finds them neglible if they fail to close such loopholes. Here look at the damn bill yourself:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query...p/~r108Qvozsu::

quote:

FACT: Kerry was one of only 18 Senators to oppose the Firearms Owners` Protection Act, which ended alarming abuses being committed under the 1968 Gun Control Act.7

7. Vote No. 142, July 9, 1985.


Hmmm let's look at the major legislation of the bill passed after the assasination of Martin Luther King:

quote:

Major Provisions:

Established categories of prohibited firearms purchasers and possessors.
Convicted felons, fugitives from justice, illegal drug users or addicts, minors, anyone adjudicated mentally defective or having been committed to a mental institution, anyone dishonorably discharged from the military, illegal aliens, anyone having renounced U.S. citizenship.

Licenses and set standards for gun dealers.
Establishes licensing fee schedule for manufacturers, importers, and dealers in firearms; sets record-keeping standards; requires licenses to be obtained from the Secretary of the Treasury; requires serial numbers on all guns.

Prohibits the mail-order sales of all firearms and ammunition.

Prohibits the interstate sale of firearms.
A handgun purchaser may only buy a gun in the state in which he/she resides; however, long gun sales to individuals in contiguous state that did not violate either state law, were allowed. (Today, long guns may be purchased from gun dealers in any state, regardless of purchaser's state of residence).

Sets age guidelines for firearms purchased through dealers.

— Handgun purchasers must be at least 21.
— Long gun purchasers must be at least 18.

Prohibits the importation of non-sporting weapons.
The importation of "Saturday Night Special" handguns and some semiautomatic assault rifles (the 43 weapons covered in the 1989 Bush Administration ban) as well as two military shotguns have been barred under this section of the law.

Sets penalties for carrying & using firearms in crimes of violence or drug trafficking.

Prohibits importation of weapons covered in the National Firearms Act and extends NFA restrictions to machine gun frames and receivers and conversion kits (i.e., parts to make machine guns).

Prohibits importation of foreign-made military surplus firearms.

Prohibited the sale and manufacture of new fully automatic civilian machine guns (effectively freezing the number of them in circulation).
This provision was adamantly opposed by the NRA. In fact, some of its most radical members did not want the McClure/Volkmer bill to pass if it contained this provision.

Immediately following the enactment of this law, the NRA announced that "its highest priority" in the next Congress would be to repeal the ban on machine guns. To date they have not introduced legislation to do this.

Prohibited the sale of parts or "conversion kits" - used to make semiautomatic firearms fully automatic.

Classifies silencer parts and kits as weapons falling under the National Firearm Act.
http://www.bradycampaign.org/facts/...e=1968&menu=gvr


I mean wow, the bill was so bad that Charleston Heston even supported it:

http://www.gunownersalliance.com/moses-1.htm



It's getting late ... I shall continue this argument tomorrow.


___________________
Retro ...

Old Post Oct-28-2004 05:42  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for occrider Click here to Send occrider a Private Message Add occrider to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism



Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas

quote:
The information on which the Iraqi Science Ministry based an Oct. 10 memo in which it reported that 377 tons of RDX explosives were missing — presumably stolen due to a lack of security — was based on "declaration" from July 15, 2002. At that time, the Iraqis said there were 141 tons of RDX explosives at the facility.
1. But the confidential IAEA documents obtained by ABC News show that on Jan. 14, 2003, the agency's inspectors recorded that just over 3 tons of RDX was stored at the facility — a considerable discrepancy from what the Iraqis reported.
The IAEA documents could mean that 138 tons of explosives were removed from the facility long before the start of the United States launched "Operation Iraqi Freedom" in March 2003.

http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=204304

Old Post Oct-28-2004 06:21  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Q5echo Click here to Send Q5echo a Private Message Add Q5echo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > Explosives disappear...
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (11): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackI NEED HELP: id of this: 666 production ????? [2004] [5]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackC.M. - Dream Universe (Original Mix) [2003]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 19:04.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!