|
| quote: | Originally posted by Radagast
I think Arbiter has met his match. |
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
Yes, I think it made a lot of sense - it has significant basis in a LOT of Scientific theories and facts |
Which parts specifically? From here it just looks like a load of intentionally obfuscatory nonsense disguised as a pseudo-philosophy. As I said to Magnetonium, specify an issue you wish to discuss - in your own words - and I'm quite happy to discuss it. I will not, however, trawl through endless paragraphs of neon-orange text for some supposedly profound observation that doesn't actually seem to exist.
| quote: | | it's not all just religious garbage, it's not about a guy 'talking to God' - it's about recognizing, through YOURSELF, that there is a God and his part of you is equally distributed throughout all of mankind. This part is perfection, and the only people who cannot see are those who refuse to open their eyes. |
So let me get this straight:
- There is a God.
- Part of God is me.
- That part of me is distributed throughout mankind.
- That part of mankind is "perfection".
- The only people who cannot see this perfection are those who refuse to "open their eyes".
First prove that God exists, then prove that part of my being is inherently constituted by God in some way, then prove that there is a comonality in this constitution shared by all of mankind, then define "perfection", prove that it exists in - and is common to - all men, then show how this somehow completes the circular logic by proving that God exists.
Maybe my eyes aren't "open" enough, but none of this makes sense on any sort of level. Once again, I fear that you're just being intentioanlly obfuscatory to avoid direct and frank discussion.
| quote: | Personally, I think most people just couldn't get past the very first time they saw the word 'God' on the thread - the statement was lost from there.  |
Hey, I'm always up for a theological debate - ask anyone who's ever seen me post on these forums. What I will not do, however, is trawl through large passages of nonsensical text cut and pasted from some book, just to highlight the intellectual laziness of the original poster. Like I said, if there's any issues you want to discuss, raise them concisely and in your own words. I'm not going to debate Mr. Neale Donald Walsch via proxy, you understand?
| quote: | | It's a shame, really - such valuable musings wasted on people who do not wish to do anything but ridicule. |
Haha, well come on.... you're not giving us much choice here are you? 
___________________
http://eschatonnow.blogspot.com/
|