|
| quote: | Originally posted by ShadoWolf
People who want a sex change operation need psychological help instead of an expensive procedure. Even if they do undergo the OPTIONAL procedure, I shouldn't have to pay for it.
In contrast, vision is vitally important to everyone and should be funded. |
They DO receive psychological help...if you bothered to read my posts, or do ANY research on this topic at all, you'd find that psychological evaluations are a *substantial* part of the process.
Are you, and anyone else holding your position, so ingnorant as to think that anyone can just walk into an office and book the surgery??? FFS, get a clue...then come back here and post 
Jay...stop for ONE second and stop trying to make everything about "equality" and "entitlement". Equality is perhaps a noble concept, but in reality it's also a farce...because people are NOT all equal. We deserve equality under the law...but some people's needs are greater than others and, as a compassionate society, more resources are allocated to those individuals. I will likely NEVER collect welfare or CPP, yet I'll have "paid" into both programs for 50 years by the time I'll have retired. I'm ok with that because I like the society we live in. I like that if someone has a tough break, or didn't have the same opportunities I did, that there are some extra resources for them out there.
Why is this surgery perceived as sooooo different than other treatments? Why is this issue being singled out? Is it because the people complaining are ignorant and clearly look down upon people with transgendered issues? I'll suggest the answer is YES. The utter disdain for this group in some posts here is evident. Some of you here seem to feel that transgendered individuals are just "fucked up" and need nothing more than psychological help. Well, I'm pleased to see that the medical community has a more comprehensive understanding of the issue and feels otherwise...
There are people, families, etc. in state-coverd therapy, rehab, social programs, etc. for months, years, even DECADES, but *this* is the issue that is identified as a gross misallocation of resources? This is the expense that is such a "waste" when people have to pay for eye exams? LOL, give me a break!!! Picking on the easily identifiable and marginalized group who will garner little support amongst the close-minded masses? how pathetic!!! Some people may want to examine their own intollerances and ignorance before they continue to post in this thread...particularly the smokers amongst you, some of who will be receiving FREE cancer therapy at some point in the future, ought to consider that this surgery is but a *DROP* in the ocean of public healthcare spending. It's also about people who likely didn't "choose" to feel this way, unlike the idiots who chose to take up smoking, or who went skiing and hit that tree, or who hurt themselves playing b-ball, etc. and received free coverage.
btw...it appears that one of the 4 people named in the case is midway through the proceedure...then the procedure become delisted. They are fighting to have the rest of their procedure covered. That doesn't strike me as terribly unreasonable.
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/nati...unal041022.html
|