 |
|
|
|
 |
zoogla
Guest
Registered: Not Yet
Location:
|
|
|
Mar-31-2005 04:31
|
|
|
 |
 |
zoogla
Guest
Registered: Not Yet
Location:
|
|
|
How do you get the images to actually show up in the post? Man, I'm such a rookie with this!!! I don't have pictures of the engine; only videos. I made a massive video with music and all: 550 MB...will have to show y'all some day.
G'night,
Fahad
|
|
Mar-31-2005 04:34
|
|
|
 |
 |
Tranceplanted
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Toronto
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by fayraree
Agree about the show aspect...I mean, I love hot chicks regardless, but for me it was all about the power under the hood. I didn't care much about the looks of the car (no paint, no skirts, no rims). It was all about engine and handling. Wider rims with wider tires would've come eventually, though.
On the FI vs. NA issue, you don't have the wear-and-tear on your engine by going NA AT FIRST, rather than jumping straight to FI. My goal was always to get to Turbo eventually, after the cam gears, ECM, etc. But I wanted to make the car at its peak possible potential before I threw the SMACK down.
I think the two complement each other rather than one vs. the other. And for that reason, you have to change the smaller parts FIRST, logically. |
While the two CAN complement each other, it's not a given. For example if you're going to slap a turbo onto your car, but you've enlarged the exhaust pipes all the way through, you might not develop enough back pressure to get decent response from the turbo. Also, things that change the timing and compression of the engine can adversely affect turbo performance. Most imports run notoriously high compression ratios, ie Hondas, which is not necessarily conducive to cramming larger amounts of air through. If you've been tweaking your car of NA performance, many of the mods may actually be counter productive to FI performance. In theory, for the best NA performance, you want the highest compression you can reasonably maintain within your engine, and run a somewhat lean fuel mixture to optimize the power and combustion. Those statements aren't necessarily what a FI tuned car should be optimized to run under.
I think while your theory is sound, in practice, it's always better to have both long term and short term plans for any project and understand that all components will eventually have to work together. If the general idea is to one day have a turbo in your car, the parts and build leading up to that should be complementary to that goal, otherwise you may have to backtrack and replace several if not many components you've already put in.
|
|
Mar-31-2005 05:51
|
|
|
 |
 |
zoogla
Guest
Registered: Not Yet
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Tranceplanted
While the two CAN complement each other, it's not a given. For example if you're going to slap a turbo onto your car, but you've enlarged the exhaust pipes all the way through, you might not develop enough back pressure to get decent response from the turbo. Also, things that change the timing and compression of the engine can adversely affect turbo performance. Most imports run notoriously high compression ratios, ie Hondas, which is not necessarily conducive to cramming larger amounts of air through. If you've been tweaking your car of NA performance, many of the mods may actually be counter productive to FI performance. In theory, for the best NA performance, you want the highest compression you can reasonably maintain within your engine, and run a somewhat lean fuel mixture to optimize the power and combustion. Those statements aren't necessarily what a FI tuned car should be optimized to run under.
I think while your theory is sound, in practice, it's always better to have both long term and short term plans for any project and understand that all components will eventually have to work together. If the general idea is to one day have a turbo in your car, the parts and build leading up to that should be complementary to that goal, otherwise you may have to backtrack and replace several if not many components you've already put in. |
Agreed 100% I know nothing about cars except for what the techies at Formula Honda feed me. And we had a plan for my car so I was trusting that they knew what they were doing, with the long term in mind (especially after fitting the owner's S2000 with a Comptech blower). I guess we can never find out...except on my current PRELUDE!!!! I will be continuing that story in the next few YEARS...
|
|
Mar-31-2005 06:00
|
|
|
 |
 |
MarkT
Automatic Static

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
|
|
|
Mar-31-2005 06:08
|
|
|
 |
 |
zoogla
Guest
Registered: Not Yet
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Skuce
Yahoo is terrible for hotlinking pics...they don't like it when you do that. Plus I think you have those linked to your personal folder...not the one that everyone can see.
Try a couple on Image Shack....I know they have zero probs with you hotlinking from them |
Thanks for the advice!! Here's a starter for my new love...as soon as it gets warmer and after the first waxing of the summer there'll be more pictures to come...
May I introduce you to my 100% stock 1997 Prelude, gentlemen...

|
|
Mar-31-2005 06:31
|
|
|
 |
 |
zoogla
Guest
Registered: Not Yet
Location:
|
|
|
By the way, were you guys able to see my Civic? Or should I also try uploading those pics to the free server?
|
|
Mar-31-2005 06:35
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:54.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|