|
| quote: | Originally posted by Dj Smitty20
The real quesiton here is...do you want a government that mismanaged a few hundred million dollars in an effort to keep the country together....OR...do you want an administration with a PM that will have his head so far up Georg Dubbya's that we won't be able to see his feet?
|
It's the Lieberals that created the national unity problem in the first place.
-the Quiet Revolution happened under the Lieberals
-Rene Leveque came out of the Lieberal Party
-the Flag Flap and de-Britishization of Canada happened under the Lieberals
-the FLQ / October Crisis (with the UNPRECEDENTED calling of martial law) happened under the Trudeau Lieberals
-the Lieberals forced bilingualism on English-speaking provinces
-the PQ separatist government came to power in 1976 with the Trudeau Lieberals in Ottawa
-the anglophone diaspora happened with the Lieberals in power
-the 1980 Quebec referendum happened with the Trudeau Lieberals in Ottawa
-the divisive 1982 "constitution" was put into place with the Trudeau Lieberals in Ottawa (which Quebec HAS STILL NOT SIGNED)
-the Western Canada Concept and other western separatists came to prominance with the Trudeau Lieberals in Ottawa
-the 1995 Quebec referendum happened with the Chretien Lieberals in Ottawa
-AdScam, which is currently fueling anger in Quebec, happened under the Lieberals
The Lieberals are tearing this country apart!
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Co...ol=968350116795
Liberals give separatists kiss of life again
CHANTAL HÉBERT
Apr. 15, 2005. 01:00 AM
If the Liberal Party of Canada did not exist, the Quebec sovereignty movement might have to invent it.
With the sponsorship scandal, the federal Liberals have given the cause of Quebec sovereignty the breath of life for the third time in little more than two decades.
It first happened under Pierre Trudeau, when the Constitution was patriated against the will of the Quebec National Assembly.
Then Trudeau and Jean Chrétien led the fight against the Meech Lake Accord.
Before the accord foundered, support for sovereignty sat at its lowest level in years. If Meech had passed, few sovereignists could imagine a scenario that would allow for a referendum rematch.
The failure of the accord also gave birth to the Bloc Québécois. For the federal Liberals who had lost francophone Quebec decisively after patriation, that actually came with a silver lining.
The advent of the Bloc made it next to impossible for a national alternative to the Liberals to grow strong roots in Quebec. That, in turn, makes it difficult for a party other than the Liberals to secure a majority government nationally.
But at least the patriation and the Meech battles were fought on the field of ideas. By allowing the sponsorship scandal to unfold on its watch, the Liberal party has outdone itself for no greater cause, it appears, than its own interest or that of some of its associates.
In the days before the scandal broke, sovereignty had many of the features of a spent force.
The Parti Québécois had just registered its lowest score in decades in a provincial election and the Bloc feared its turn was soon to come in the upcoming federal campaign.
Instead, it rode the scandal backlash to its best showing since the pre-referendum era.
The revelations that have since come to light at the Gomery commission ensure that whenever the next election takes place, the Bloc will improve on that high score.
The Liberals have joined the Conservatives and the NDP as non-contenders in francophone Quebec. Such is their predicament that they have fallen to third place, far behind the BQ.
In the next campaign, Stephen Harper and Jack Layton will actually find it easier to draft candidates in Quebec than Martin.
Very few people want to run for a party that is routinely equated with corruption around the water coolers.
Against this backdrop, the Prime Minister is arguing that Harper will be gambling with national unity for his own partisan interest if he defeats Martin's minority government over the sponsorship scandal.
But the Bloc is set to dominate Quebec for at least one and maybe two more election cycles.
Martin's core argument really is that if voters outside Quebec ever chose to replace the Liberals with the Conservatives, that party's agenda would push Quebecers to bolt from the federation.
But if Quebecers' attachment to Canada was so fragile, they would surely have left in the face of the Liberal constitutional moves of the past decades.
Indeed, compared to Meech or patriation, the sponsorship scandal does not seriously register on the Richter scale of unity earthquakes.
In 1990, Quebecers were so angry over the demise of Meech that they massively wanted to turn their backs on Canada. They clamoured for a referendum.
In the case of the sponsorship scandal, it is the Liberal party that they are turning their backs on in disgust. But that feeling has, so far, not translated into an outburst of referendum fever.
From Quebec's perspective, if the next federal election is to be a litmus test of anything Canadian, it may be of the capacity of the rest of the country to hold its nose and reward Liberal efforts to smother the political stench of the sponsorship affair with the flag.
also see: http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/nati...ano-050425.html
___________________
Nathan Fake - Outhouse (Valentino Kanzyani Remix) || ID PLZ! PVD ID!!!
Disco and classical had sex while watching a sci-fi movie. Their child: trance.
Last edited by ShadoWolf on Apr-26-2005 at 17:26
|