quote:

Originally posted by tribu I think hes likely guilty of child molestation, but in this case, I think he may be innocent. With the scads of child abuse allegations Jackson has faced over the years, why would you even let your child within the confines of neverland ranch except as a get rich quick scheme?

amen

Whether he is guilty or not is largely a matter of conjecture - the evidence itself is weak and tainted. I personally despise the man, but anyone who isn't completely blinded by their instinctive suspicion of all that is "different" would have no choice but to tell you: a guilty verdict would clearly be inappropriate.

Also, I think the contents of this thread is a good example of why jurors should be paid professionals, not random people off the street who decide other people's fate based on their baseless "instincts."

quote:

Originally posted by Arbiter Also, I think the contents of this thread is a good example of why jurors should be paid professionals, not random people off the street who decide other people's fate based on their baseless "instincts."

Maybe Micheal should be given the death sentence while he does his last concert. Right at the end of the concert all the kids get to come up on stage & clobber him to death with Iron batterns. I think Micheal will enjoy that way to die.

___________________

Jackson has outlived his usefulness I'm afraid. Whether he's guilty or innocent doesn't matter anymore.

___________________
Everybody agrees with me. If you don't, it's because you're a nobody.

he ain t touch those kids they touched him

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by AnotherWay83 wont post a pic because i dont like the thought of chix printing it out and fapping to it, sorry ladies

http://soundcloud.com/jaykinard
check out my radio show Harmonic Dissonance every 1st Thursday of the month at 10:00 pm EST on Party103
*** upcoming gigs***TBD

quote:

Originally posted by hitokiri he ain t touch those kids they touched him

quote:

Originally posted by Arbiter Whether he is guilty or not is largely a matter of conjecture - the evidence itself is weak and tainted. I personally despise the man, but anyone who isn't completely blinded by their instinctive suspicion of all that is "different" would have no choice but to tell you: a guilty verdict would clearly be inappropriate. Also, I think the contents of this thread is a good example of why jurors should be paid professionals, not random people off the street who decide other people's fate based on their baseless "instincts."

guh, you just pwn everything. ...guh ...words... stolen

___________________
Soundcloud

I don't know, but the parodies from this trial are hilarious.

nuff said!

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by AnotherWay83 wont post a pic because i dont like the thought of chix printing it out and fapping to it, sorry ladies

http://soundcloud.com/jaykinard
check out my radio show Harmonic Dissonance every 1st Thursday of the month at 10:00 pm EST on Party103
*** upcoming gigs***TBD

obviously not guilty

definitely not guilty.
and tom mesereau is a badass attorney, he just destroys the prosecution most of the time. its obvious its all bullshit. They try to bring in the 1993 case to give to try and give them more credibility. its all about the money as said before.

I think he's guilty. I don't think the case would have gone this far if they did'nt have any evidence. And he's been accused about similar crimes in the past so there has to be something there.