Originally posted by scAza
yeah but he's aready put them in over £500m debt, and he will no doubt have doubled ticket prices within a year or two, which makes him a fucking arsewipe full stop.
no he wont. He will riase the pirces, but keep them at a competitive price. IT makes business sense. Chelsea is massivley in debt aswell. That doesnt make a difference
quote:
Originally posted by scAza
if you aske me he's very silly, coz football clubs are not a good way to make money for yourself, especially if you need to clear £500m before seeing profit!
THere not a way to make money for yourself? eh.......okay....
I dont think it will be a bad idea. People seem to be forgetting hes gambling with his own money, if it goes titis up, he done for. Hes a amazingly successful business man, i dont see that stopping now. There gonna have alot more money to spend in the summer which is a bad thing.
also, some of the comments coming forms the supporters group are comical, biggest bunch of tools ever.
___________________
Liverpool Champions of Europe 2005!
TA's NFL survival League winner 2006!
May-14-2005 22:53
Kato
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Manchester, England
quote:
Originally posted by King Ecnal
Does anyone see this as a good thing for spreading Premeirship and even European Football across America...? I mean, the only club I had ever heard of when I first really got interested in football in 94 when the world cup was over here were ManU.... no doubt that over here the teams that are most noticeable are Barca, ManU and Real Madrid, for me anyway, through jersey's and other merchandise.... maybe I'm looking at this the wrong way, but what if Glazer really spreads ManU across America as almost the first ambassador to America??? All I can think is, all ManU games on an American National television network in the coming years...? Maybe he's got something? Or maybe all you guys are right, and he's just a money hungry bastard... BUT HEY!!! The Lightning won the Stanley Cup the last time around and the Bucs won the Super Bowl in 2002??? So, he had some sort of a hand in that....
True United fans could not give a toss how many supporters we have in America
May-14-2005 22:54
Kato
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Manchester, England
quote:
Originally posted by Michael19
no he wont. He will riase the pirces, but keep them at a competitive price. IT makes business sense. Chelsea is massivley in debt aswell. That doesnt make a difference
THere not a way to make money for yourself? eh.......okay....
I dont think it will be a bad idea. People seem to be forgetting hes gambling with his own money, if it goes titis up, he done for. Hes a amazingly successful business man, i dont see that stopping now. There gonna have alot more money to spend in the summer which is a bad thing.
also, some of the comments coming forms the supporters group are comical, biggest bunch of tools ever.
You are wrong, he is gambling with OUR money and OUR team. He is putting Manchester United into £265m of debt and if it all goes tits up we will lose our club.
May-14-2005 22:59
Michael19
Liverpool FC fan
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Eire
quote:
Originally posted by Kato
True United fans could not give a toss how many supporters we have in America
really? thats a fairly stupid way of looking at it. After all the more supoorters = more money.
quote:
Originally posted by Kato
You are wrong, he is gambling with OUR money and OUR team. He is putting Manchester United into £265m of debt and if it all goes tits up we will lose our club.
YOUR club? YOUR team? no its not. He bought your club and team, so its his to do what he likes. This is the price you pay for whoring your self on the stock market. YOu lose your club, or he loses all his money, hmmmm i wonder which is more of a worry to him.
How many shares did you own?
___________________
Liverpool Champions of Europe 2005!
TA's NFL survival League winner 2006!
May-14-2005 23:10
projektion-
tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Portsmouth
quote:
Originally posted by Kytracid If Glazer takes over, expect Machester United to get relegated within the next 5-10 years.
Bwahaha.
May-14-2005 23:56
King Ecnal
PGA
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Massachusetts
quote:
After all the more supoorters = more money.
That's how I see it... Yankees and Red Sox have fans all over the continental U.S. and the rest of the world.... it's unreal how many Yanks and Sox fans there are in the oddest places.... and they are the two biggest MLB clubs....
now that I think of it.... prediction? Glazer get's so upset the way the fans are treating his takeover, he tells the ManU fans to stick it up their ass, HE MOVES the team to Tampa, and they butt heads with the likes of the MIGHTY Metrostars and Galaxy of the MLS...lol.....
Glory Glory Tampa Bay United
May-15-2005 00:52
raveed
- -
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: San Jose, California
quote:
Originally posted by Michael19
no he wont. He will riase the pirces, but keep them at a competitive price. IT makes business sense. Chelsea is massivley in debt aswell. That doesnt make a difference
Chelsea in debt???? lol ...abramovich is worth 7 billion pounds and has spent 300 million pounds out of his own pocket to build the club .. naturally they experiencing losses but they are not in any sort of hectic debts
May-15-2005 02:34
Biggo
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: May 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
i dont think anything good can come of the glazer take over. the interet to payback the loans he has taken out comes to about 48 million pounds a year, which is off memory over double the current profit man utd make at the moment.
i am sure glazer has it well planned out on how he plans to deal with the debt, but it will in the end be coming out of the pockets of the fans.
May-15-2005 02:52
hardstyle
Technoaddict
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: In the Qlimax
lol
I cant give a rat ass what will happen with Unired, i want to see Glazer do well so whiny fans will piss off
May-15-2005 07:03
Kato
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Manchester, England
quote:
Originally posted by Michael19
really? thats a fairly stupid way of looking at it. After all the more supoorters = more money.
YOUR club? YOUR team? no its not. He bought your club and team, so its his to do what he likes. This is the price you pay for whoring your self on the stock market. YOu lose your club, or he loses all his money, hmmmm i wonder which is more of a worry to him.
How many shares did you own?
You are clearly a thick **** so I am not going to bother arguing with you. Go back to your great transfer thread and make up some more bullshit about Raul coming to Old Trafford
May-15-2005 11:39
Sid
uncle thiddles
Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Yank U
quality
___________________
cbf
May-16-2005 09:38
Magnetonium
Dubstep = Douchestep
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Port Burwell, Ontario, Canada
quote:
Originally posted by Kato
Regarding Glazer, what this takeover means is that true United fans like me are going to be paying more and more to watch a team which is having its soul taken away by some money grabbing yank. And what are we going to get for the extra money that we will be charged? Massive debt, a chairman who knows nothing about football and a very high chance that the club could go completely tits up like Leeds.
Fuck Off Glazer!
I am not a Man U fan, but I completely agree with this statement.
___________________
Whenever you go and buy something, you are affecting someone somewhere, be it environment, a person, or a community - you're making a statement with what you buy. So make it a smart choice ... Its a big picture