Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > Surprised by the lack of Cindy Sheehan Threads...
Pages (5): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
DaveSZ
When The Levee Breaks



Registered: Jan 2003
Location: ATX

The majority of American public opinion is on Cindy's side now (except for her demanding the troops be brought home immediatly).

It just took a little longer for the opinion of most Americans to catch up to the world's opinion of Iraqnam, but considering we don't have a viable media here (everything is gossip-oriented), it's not too much of a surprise.



http://www.startribune.com/stories/587/5580679.html

Results of AP-Ipsos poll on attitudes about Iraq
Associated Press
August 26, 2005 POLL0827.METHOD

Click to learn more...

The Associated Press-Ipsos poll on public attitudes about the war in Iraq is based on telephone interviews with 1,001 adults from all states except Alaska and Hawaii. The interviews were conducted Aug. 22-24 by Ipsos, an international polling firm.

Results were weighted to represent the population by demographic factors such as age, sex, region, race and income.

No more than one time in 20 should chance variations in the sample cause the results to vary by more than 3 percentage points from the answers that would be obtained if all Americans were polled.

There are other sources of potential error in polls, including the wording and order of questions. Results may not total 100 percent because of rounding. An asterisk indicates less than 1 percent.




1. Do you approve or disapprove of the way the Bush administration has conducted the war in Iraq? (IF APPROVE/DISAPPROVE, ASK Is that strongly or somewhat?(Results from June 2005 in parentheses)

--Strongly approve, 20 percent (26)

--Somewhat approve, 16 percent (15)

--Somewhat disapprove, 13 percent (11)

--Strongly disapprove, 45 percent (45)

--Not sure, 5 percent (3)

TOTAL APPROVE -- 37 percent (41)

TOTAL DISAPPROVE -- 58 percent (56)



2. All in all, thinking about how things have gone in Iraq since the United States went to war there in March 2003, do you think the United States ...

(Results from June 2005 in parentheses)

--Made the right decision in going to war in Iraq, 43 percent (42)

--Made a mistake in going to war in Iraq, 53 percent (53)

--Not sure, 4 percent (5)



3. How likely is it that a stable, democratic government will be established in Iraq? Is it ...

(Results from February 2005 in parentheses)

--Very likely, 11 percent (10)

--Somewhat likely, 40 percent (41)

--Not too likely, 30 percent (31)

--Not at all likely, 16 percent (16)

--Not sure, 3 percent (2)


4. Has the military action in Iraq ...

(Results from April 2004 in parentheses)

--Increased the threat of terrorism in the world, 50 percent (47)

--Decreased the threat of terrorism in the world, 20 percent (25 percent)

--Had no effect on the threat of terrorism, 28 percent (25 percent)

--Not sure, 3 percent (3 percent)


5. Should the United States keep troops in Iraq until the situation has stabilized, or should the United States bring its troops home from Iraq immediately?

(Results from June 2005 in parentheses)

--Keep troops in Iraq until the situation has stabilized, 60 percent (59)

--Bring its troops home from Iraq immediately, 37 percent (37)

--Not sure, 3 percent (4)



6. Do you think it is OK for people who oppose the war in Iraq to express their opposition publicly, or not?

--Yes, 87 percent


--No, 12 percent

--Not sure, 1 percent





7. Do you have a friend, colleague or family member who has served in the military effort in Iraq at any time since March 2003?

--Yes, 54 percent

--No, 45 percent

--Not sure, 1 percent


___________________
http://www.discoboomer.com/forums/

Last edited by DaveSZ on Aug-27-2005 at 05:40

Old Post Aug-27-2005 05:33 
Click Here to See the Profile for DaveSZ Click here to Send DaveSZ a Private Message Add DaveSZ to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism



Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas

quote:
Originally posted by ogvh5150
You're denying that he got this country into a war about lies.
no. i'm denying that he lied. something you can't prove. you won't. because he didn't.



quote:
I am not on the camp casey bandwagon nor plan on being there.
however, yall do have at least one thing in common.

quote:
For you or anyone to equate me with having a partisan slant is silly at best to outrageous at large.
you're being a little defensive for no reason. i have been guilty of the same once or twice. i haven't equated you with anything but with maybe others who have fallen for the afforementioned "Bush lied" agenda's.

quote:
But you are in the pro-war camp. So it goes without saying that you would be in danger of violating US Code Title 18 Part 1 Chapter 47 Subsection 1001 which in part reads:



And if you are in the military your have sworn to uphold the law.

okay i really don't know what to say to that...other than i'm not so sure that title 18 has jurisiction applicable to myself or others like me more than title 10 does. either way, you're way off base with a statement like that. i'm sworn to uphold the orders of the office of the President and the officers appointed above me.

Old Post Aug-27-2005 06:17  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Q5echo Click here to Send Q5echo a Private Message Add Q5echo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Fir3start3r
Armin Acolyte



Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada

quote:
Originally posted by ogvh5150
And if you are in the military your have sworn to uphold the law.


No...he's sworn to listen to his superiors...

Police uphold the law...and even then, they are not judges in which to offer opinion of the law in which they serve.


___________________
"...End? No, the journey doesn't end here. Death is just another path...one that we all must take.
The grey rain-curtain of this world rolls back, and all change to silver glass...and then you see it...
...white shores...and beyond...the far green country under a swift sunrise."

Old Post Aug-27-2005 06:52  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for Fir3start3r Click here to Send Fir3start3r a Private Message Add Fir3start3r to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Cyrus King
Anti NeoCon Addict



Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
no. i'm denying that he lied. something you can't prove. you won't. because he didn't.



however, yall do have at least one thing in common.

you're being a little defensive for no reason. i have been guilty of the same once or twice. i haven't equated you with anything but with maybe others who have fallen for the afforementioned "Bush lied" agenda's.


okay i really don't know what to say to that...other than i'm not so sure that title 18 has jurisiction applicable to myself or others like me more than title 10 does. either way, you're way off base with a statement like that. i'm sworn to uphold the orders of the office of the President and the officers appointed above me.


If that monkey didnt lie.. as you proclaim.. what did he do then?/ Tell the truth??

man.. you are so saturated with this patriotic american bullshit that its making you blind


___________________
"This place isn't big enough for me to blow it up."
-MARCO V

Old Post Aug-27-2005 08:12 
Click Here to See the Profile for Cyrus King Click here to Send Cyrus King a Private Message Add Cyrus King to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism



Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas

quote:
Originally posted by Cyrus King
what did he do then?/ Tell the truth??

yes. as far as anybody else knew. including you. what, after the fact you're all of a sudden an expert on who possesed what? we all are now. what was worth the sacrifice to lie, knowing nothing was there? we've been thru this before.


quote:
you are so saturated with this patriotic american bullshit that its making you blind
i'm just defending a position that is not only worth defending, but irresistably defensible at the same time. i'm lazy like that.

Old Post Aug-27-2005 09:00  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Q5echo Click here to Send Q5echo a Private Message Add Q5echo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
ogvh5150
Formula 1 Addict



Registered: Aug 2003
Location: F1 2008 Red Bull Racing/BMW Sauber

quote:
Originally posted by Cyrus King
If that monkey didnt lie.. as you proclaim.. what did he do then?/ Tell the truth??

man.. you are so saturated with this patriotic american bullshit that its making you blind


Now you make sense Cyrus.

+1 for you.


___________________

Old Post Aug-27-2005 13:54 
Click Here to See the Profile for ogvh5150 Click here to Send ogvh5150 a Private Message Add ogvh5150 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
MisterOpus1
Grumpy Old Fart



Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Kansas City

I hesitate a bit at stating flat out that our President lied to us to get us into war, only because in the most objective manner this would be extremely difficult to prove (say in a court of law, for example). I mean, yes, it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, but simply demonstrating that there were no WMD found, no AQ links, etc. does not in of itself demonstrate a willful act of lying. It could very well also demonstrate idiocy or incompetence as well (and that does include the intelligence gatherers).

But again, let me be clear - do I believe he and his Administration likely lied? Well Jesus, he is a politician, right? Most given politicians will go to great lengths, even lying, to get their given policy passed through and sold. Bush just happens to be the most powerful politician, and his policies just happen to matter the most, so you can see where his push to get his policy passed would lead. Now at this time, Sen. Roberts of the Senate Select Intelligence Committee has REFUSED to start Part 2 of the SCSI report pertaining to this very question of whether or not the White House misused the intelligence to make their case for war. Instead he's attempted to defer that part to last March's Intelligence report from Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction :

http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/03/31/intel.report/

In which they stated WITHOUT TIMING ONE SECOND INTO INVESTIGATING THE QUESTION THEMSELVES that the Administration didn't misuse intelligence. As Reid states in the article above:

"I believe it is essential that we hold both the intelligence agencies and senior policy-makers accountable," the Nevada Democrat said.

Reid called on the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Kansas Sen. Pat Roberts, "to investigate whether Bush administration officials misused intelligence."

And leave it to CNN and the rest of the bend-me-over-I-love-it-hard MSM press not to push this question further on Roberts.

My point is we have not yet fully investigated this question, and to be honest with my hack Kansas Senator Roberts who does nothing but tow the GOP party line, I don't expect to see one. And the ranking Democratic member of the Senate Select Intelligence Committee, Sen. Rockefeller, is still looking for his backbone from the part 1 report that came out in August 2004.

So the bottom line is I can't form a solid conclusion on the matter. Do I have my suspicions? Uh, yeah. I just produced a page of counterintelligence that this Administration willfully ignored prior to invasion. And I do think the words:

"intelligence was being fixed around the policy"

is a bit telling from the Downing Street Memo. But this story is nothing but a fart in a windstorm with our darn "liberal media", so what else can be said?


___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...

Old Post Aug-27-2005 14:04  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for MisterOpus1 Click here to Send MisterOpus1 a Private Message Add MisterOpus1 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism



Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas

quote:
Originally posted by MisterOpus1
I hesitate a bit at stating flat out that our President lied to us

so fellas, if this guy agrees with me (even somewhat to say something like this) then you and Cindy must be on the wrong side of this.

just consider this alone. epic.

Old Post Aug-27-2005 20:51  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Q5echo Click here to Send Q5echo a Private Message Add Q5echo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism



Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas

quote:
Originally posted by MisterOpus1
I hesitate a bit at stating flat out that our President lied to us

so fellas, if this guy agrees with me (even somewhat to say something like this) then you and Cindy must be on the wrong side of this.

just consider this alone. epic.

Old Post Aug-27-2005 20:51  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Q5echo Click here to Send Q5echo a Private Message Add Q5echo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
ogvh5150
Formula 1 Addict



Registered: Aug 2003
Location: F1 2008 Red Bull Racing/BMW Sauber

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
okay i really don't know what to say to that...other than i'm not so sure that title 18 has jurisiction applicable to myself or others like me more than title 10 does. either way, you're way off base with a statement like that. i'm sworn to uphold the orders of the office of the President and the officers appointed above me.




"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

"I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God." (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)
Oaths of Enlistment and Oaths of Office


Article II Section 1
Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation:--"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Article IV Section 3 Clause 2: The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.
United States Constitution


US CODE TITLE 5, PART III, Subpart B, CHAPTER 33, SUBCHAPTER II, § 3331
§ 3331. Oath of office

An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” This section does not affect other oaths required by law.

US CODE TITLE 10, Subtitle A, PART II, CHAPTER 47, SUBCHAPTER X, § 932
§ 932. Art. 132. Frauds against the United States

Any person subject to this chapter—
(1) who, knowing it to be false or fraudulent—
(A) makes any claim against the United States or any officer thereof; or
(B) presents to any person in the civil or military service thereof, for approval or payment, any claim against the United States or any officer thereof;

US CODE TITLE 50, CHAPTER 40, § 2302
§ 2302. Definitions

In this chapter:
(1) The term “weapon of mass destruction” means any weapon or device that is intended, or has the capability, to cause death or serious bodily injury to a significant number of people through the release, dissemination, or impact of—
(A) toxic or poisonous chemicals or their precursors;
(B) a disease organism; or
(C) radiation or radioactivity.
US CODE


___________________

Last edited by ogvh5150 on Aug-28-2005 at 14:10

Old Post Aug-28-2005 13:57 
Click Here to See the Profile for ogvh5150 Click here to Send ogvh5150 a Private Message Add ogvh5150 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Fir3start3r
Armin Acolyte



Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada

quote:
Originally posted by ogvh5150


"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

"I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God." (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)
Oaths of Enlistment and Oaths of Office


Article II Section 1
Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation:--"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Article IV Section 3 Clause 2: The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.
United States Constitution


US CODE TITLE 5, PART III, Subpart B, CHAPTER 33, SUBCHAPTER II, § 3331
§ 3331. Oath of office

An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” This section does not affect other oaths required by law.

US CODE TITLE 10, Subtitle A, PART II, CHAPTER 47, SUBCHAPTER X, § 932
§ 932. Art. 132. Frauds against the United States

Any person subject to this chapter—
(1) who, knowing it to be false or fraudulent—
(A) makes any claim against the United States or any officer thereof; or
(B) presents to any person in the civil or military service thereof, for approval or payment, any claim against the United States or any officer thereof;

US CODE TITLE 50, CHAPTER 40, § 2302
§ 2302. Definitions

In this chapter:
(1) The term “weapon of mass destruction” means any weapon or device that is intended, or has the capability, to cause death or serious bodily injury to a significant number of people through the release, dissemination, or impact of—
(A) toxic or poisonous chemicals or their precursors;
(B) a disease organism; or
(C) radiation or radioactivity.
US CODE


That's it?
Hell, our PM is pretty much guilty of ripping off millions of dollars of taxpayers money (something you just don't do here in Canada; big taboo)

How's this for a laundry list?
quote:

Trudeau claimed that MPs turn into instant nobodies the moment they were 50 yards from the House of Commons. Chretien learned everything he knows from Trudeau. He was Trudeau's justice minister. They wrote the flawed Charter together.
Canadians are just now beginning to realize that they are in deep trouble because they reelected the Liberals to Ottawa last November 2000. This latest 20% pay hike that the Liberals just took is only a drop in the bucket. They are only getting started. The lesions are about to continue. Stay tuned.

Canadians should have known because the list of Liberal shenanigans is long and peculiar. Liberals have little or no concern for taxpayers' money. The money is there to be taken or given to friends. Legally of course, through pay hikes or giveaways through HRDC or CIDA. They deny all conflict of interest in these giveaways. Prove it, they say.
1. Liberals promised to abolish Mulroney's GST and it was a major 1993 election promise. When Liberal MP John Nunziata voted against the 1996 budget for this reason, Mr. Chrétien kicked him out of the Liberal Caucus and excommunicated him from the Liberal Party. He was a living breathing example to the others -- what would happen to them if they showed the slightest independence.
2. They expropriated British Columbian property at Nanoose Bay, B.C.
3. They breached a signed contract in the Pearson Airport scandal. They denied compensation to the wronged parties. Then they were forced to pay $60-million in damages only taxpayers money.
4. They breached a signed purchase contract in the EH-101 helicopter scandal. They were then forced to pay $500 million in cancellation fees only taxpayers money.
5. They cut off the Somalia inquiry after it found uncomfortable evidence about the Liberals.
6. Protesters at APAC were pepper-sprayed by the RCMP and the Liberals covered the connection to the prime minister. The $5-million Inquiry sent Chretien an invitation to give evidence instead of a subpoena. He declined the invitation. Surprise. Surprise.
7. Liberals moved closure about 50 times in Parliament to cut off debate on their bills, including Sheila's Bill C-55.
8. Prime Minister Chretien showed his arrogance to Albertans when he appointed a senator-for-life from Alberta despite the fact that he knew Albertans had paid for an election to elect their own senators. The Governor General -- not the prime minister is supposed to appoint senators.
9. Prime Minister Jean Chretien was too busy skiing to attend the funeral of King Hussein of Jordan. Canada was the only member the Security Council or the G7 which did not send a Leader or Head of State to the funeral.
10. The party-disciplined Liberals defeated a Reform motion to use the notwithstanding clause to overturn a B.C. court decision declaring possession of child pornography legal. (143 to 129)
11. Liberals have an open-door policy to refugee claimants, spies and foreign terrorists. They also have strong connections with the huge immigration industry.
12. Both the arrogant socialist Liberals and the (NDP) B.C. government made a deal with the Nisga people without input from the citizens of B.C. Our politicians did not allow British Columbians to be heard.
13. Jean Chrétien gave his friends in Shawinigan: The Canoe Hall of Fame ($500,000); A tourism museum ($5 million); Several hotels ($3.8 million); A congress centre ($3 million); a fountain in the river - all complements of the Canadian taxpayer. More money than all the western provinces received. And no questions allowed or answers given.
14. Several shady people in Chretiens constituency received millions of dollars in taxpayers money to create jobs. There are so many unanswered questions about the shenanigans in Shawinigan that it would take an independent government inquiry to get to the bottom of this obvious conflict of interest. The Liberals refused to allow this inquiry. Surprise, surprise.
15. Liberals blamed the RCMP for building a private road into Chretien's cottage.
16. Liberals allow parliament to sit as seldom as possible (90 days in 2000). One way to cut down on the repetitive questions about Shawinigan.
17. Liberals refuse to talk about the flawed constitution.
18. They shred all incriminating papers.
19. They stall all scandals and cancel all inquiries.
20. They buy all elections with billions of taxpayers' money.
21. They buy all culture groups, have-not provinces, lobby groups and special-interest groups in Canada.
22. They vehemently represent all special-interest groups, minority groups, feminists, multicultural groups, aboriginals, deviate groups, the huge immigration industry, the vast CBC, the unions, the entertainment industry, the environmental movement, the nuclear industry, the monstrous federal bureaucracy and the Quebecois but have forgotten the average English-speaking Canadian.
23. They brought us the Airbus fiasco, which benefited Mulroney (He of the GST got more millions.).
24. They brought us unnecessary gun control for law abiding Canadians which benefited the criminals.
25. They brought us unemployment twice as high as the U.S.?
26. They brought us a 63-cent dollar.
27. They brought us forced bilingualism ($4 billion a year) and multiculturalism from coast to coast to coast.
28. They control 50% of the economy compared to government control of only 33% in the U.S.
29. They brought Canadians the highest taxes in the industrialized world.
30. They brought us a $600 billion national debt?
31. They ensured that all those appointed to the Supreme Court are not asked questions about their vested interested or hidden prejudices.
32. This ensured that these left wing appointees to the Supreme Court made left wing legal decisions -- pornography, homosexual rights, Indian land claims and Quebec separation.
33. They refused to use the notwithstanding clause while waiting for the leftist Supreme Court to put a leftist spin or cancel every law in the land. (58 laws since 1982)
34. They sent bombers to bomb civilians in Yugoslavia, all for human rights.
35. They sent our soldiers to Bosnia, Kosovo, Somalia, Rwanda (While a million people were being slaughtered), the Republic of Central Africa, Haiti and East Timor -- anywhere the United Nations pointed a finger.
36. They allowed all prisoners to vote. Guess who these criminals voted for?

>>Source<<

It's funny to watch U.S. citizens complain about their government...


___________________
"...End? No, the journey doesn't end here. Death is just another path...one that we all must take.
The grey rain-curtain of this world rolls back, and all change to silver glass...and then you see it...
...white shores...and beyond...the far green country under a swift sunrise."

Old Post Aug-28-2005 16:08  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for Fir3start3r Click here to Send Fir3start3r a Private Message Add Fir3start3r to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism



Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas

quote:
Originally posted by ogvh5150


"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

"I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God." (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)
Oaths of Enlistment and Oaths of Office


Article II Section 1
Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation:--"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Article IV Section 3 Clause 2: The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.
United States Constitution


US CODE TITLE 5, PART III, Subpart B, CHAPTER 33, SUBCHAPTER II, § 3331
§ 3331. Oath of office

An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” This section does not affect other oaths required by law.

US CODE TITLE 10, Subtitle A, PART II, CHAPTER 47, SUBCHAPTER X, § 932
§ 932. Art. 132. Frauds against the United States

Any person subject to this chapter—
(1) who, knowing it to be false or fraudulent—
(A) makes any claim against the United States or any officer thereof; or
(B) presents to any person in the civil or military service thereof, for approval or payment, any claim against the United States or any officer thereof;

US CODE TITLE 50, CHAPTER 40, § 2302
§ 2302. Definitions

In this chapter:
(1) The term “weapon of mass destruction” means any weapon or device that is intended, or has the capability, to cause death or serious bodily injury to a significant number of people through the release, dissemination, or impact of—
(A) toxic or poisonous chemicals or their precursors;
(B) a disease organism; or
(C) radiation or radioactivity.
US CODE

wow. i guess i gave you too much credit.

Old Post Aug-29-2005 02:55  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Q5echo Click here to Send Q5echo a Private Message Add Q5echo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > Surprised by the lack of Cindy Sheehan Threads...
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (5): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackWarm melodic tune inside [2005] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackJames Lawson & Steve Hill - "Inside Of Me" [2004]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:48.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!