Originally posted by stren
its kinda bad for england oddly enough, cause i it was a tie or we would win, you'd prolly get rid of Eriksson
nah, only way sven would go would be if we failed to qualify. He made some awful decisions last night too
Jenas - not good enough
Smith - Proven striker, not midfielder
Crouch - 0 goals this season, whilst Bent on the bench has 8 in 8 games, doesn't take a genius to figure out which one should get a chance
Oct-13-2005 12:05
Jackson
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: t'North England
quote:
Originally posted by Ian^
nah, only way sven would go would be if we failed to qualify. He made some awful decisions last night too
Jenas - not good enough
Smith - Proven striker, not midfielder
Crouch - 0 goals this season, whilst Bent on the bench has 8 in 8 games, doesn't take a genius to figure out which one should get a chance
I'm sorry, im not sure if im the only one, but i piss myself when i see lanky Crouch running, he looks like a mixture of Lurch off the Adams family and D-res!!!
___________________
Oct-13-2005 14:45
squirrelly
The Phun Nun
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: In the Shower
quote:
Originally posted by DRM
cuz ur keeper made a fair few good saves
What? Of course if he made good saves England didn't score any more points. That's like saying "Oh we could have gotten a lot of pussy last night." "Why didn't you?" "Because we were at a gay club."
Registered: Mar 2001
Location: Somewhere where it's raining
quote:
Originally posted by squirrelly
What? Of course if he made good saves England didn't score any more points. That's like saying "Oh we could have gotten a lot of pussy last night." "Why didn't you?" "Because we were at a gay club."
why is it people are having that much trouble comprehending that england played a lot better than poland, and deserved more from the game than a 1 goal victory???
yes we didnt score more but thats how things go, doesnt mean we didnt deserve it tho.
Originally posted by DRM
why is it people are having that much trouble comprehending that england played a lot better than poland, and deserved more from the game than a 1 goal victory???
yes we didnt score more but thats how things go, doesnt mean we didnt deserve it tho.
If they didn't score more it's because they were unable to, which in term makes them not only undeserving to get more goals than they did, it means that they weren't good enough to score more goals. Sorry, but that's just how things go.
Registered: Mar 2001
Location: Somewhere where it's raining
quote:
Originally posted by squirrelly
If they didn't score more it's because they were unable to, which in term makes them not only undeserving to get more goals than they did, it means that they weren't good enough to score more goals. Sorry, but that's just how things go.
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Walbrzych, Dolny Slask
ja pierdole kurwa ... all we needed was a tie and we would have finished on top of the group ....but whatever, we still auto-qualifty for the WC, as runnerups.
___________________
[img]http://x11.putfile.com/12/34902035365.jpg[/mg]
Please see sig rules thanks.
Oct-13-2005 21:35
jupiterone
housin' guide
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: los angeles
frankowski scored one hell of a goal...
Oct-13-2005 22:37
kr00t0n
Archduke of Awesome
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Hibernating
quote:
Originally posted by DRM
thats such a ridiculous way to look at things
even though I fully understand what you mean, she is correct from a logical standpoint
we don't have points in football u know 
I'm sick leave me alone. 
