|
| quote: | Originally posted by Ishkur
Commercial is that which attempts to appeal to the most possible number of people. Something that strives for universality.
Of course, in order to achieve this aim, the music must thus be very safe, very bland, and very inoffensive. So it's not a thing, per se. It is a process. A process of political correctness, in a way.
The process of commercialization is the process of watering down and smoothing something out for mass digestion. Any genre of music can become commercial if it’s given the shiny, plastic, polished sheen of simple tinker toys (or any mass-produced consumer good). In fact, over the past fifty years, everything, from rap, to rock, to punk, to R&B, to jazz, to techno has become commercial music at one time or another. The purpose of commercial music is not to evoke emotion or have any lasting appeal. It is to move units; sell the most music to the most possible numbers of people very quickly. It is essentially fast food; something people do not value the inherent quality of but seek instantaneous and short-term sustenance.
It is not elitist to hate this process. For those of us who enjoy care, quality, professionalism, and earnest, heartfelt passion, with genuine emotion injected into our music, commercial music is blasphemy. People don't hate it because it's bad--quite the contrary, commercial music is expertly produced. No. People hate it because it's simply boring. It has to be, in order to be likable by everyone. |
A somewhat interesting post, however, it fails to explain the mass appeal of controversial artists such as eminem, 50 cent, Marilyn Manson and even Elvis with his "perverse hip-shaking". These people are commercial yet to many are not "safe" or inoffensive. Furthermore, something being boring is not enough for people to hate it. People hate commercial music because it does suck, no matter the production quality, and are angered by the masses who love and support such shallow music.
___________________
M.I.K.E. IS GOD
|