 |
|
|
|
 |
Abhay
banned user

Registered: May 2004
Location: mould coast
|
|
|
he is capable of good mixing, why he doesn't do it, i don't know...
i think he intentionally likes to mix in a way, that is obvious that he is mixing in a track. sometimes what he does works EXCELLENTLY (hard to tell when one track ends, and the other finishes), other times, it comes off horrible.
Favourite tracks:
13. Loves We Lost, The - (with Allure)
14. Perfect Silene - (E-Craig's 212 remix, with Blank & Jones)
love the way their mixed, too^
Moments - (with Tone Depth/Soultan)
Only One - (Rave mix, with Sensorica/Jin Key)
Gravity - (with P.O.S.)
other great tracks:
Do What U Want - (Max Graham Afterhours in Montreal mix, with JASEfos/Claire Van Der Boom)
Palma Solane - (with Estuera/Re:Locate
Gravity 10 - (with Grayarea/Erik Shepard)
|
|
Dec-17-2005 17:58
|
|
|
 |
 |
tubularbills
Max Power!

Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Middle of fucking nowhere
|
|
|
Ok, this is why I was disappointed with ISOS4:
1) Previous ISOS albums all started off so dreamy, ambient, and just something that I think really helped set the mood for the entire album. And that was what I was used to.
And what did ISOS4 start with? Like A Waterfall. ugh. granted, the song is all right - it shouldn't be used to start an ISOS album. Palma Solane i think was a better choice....but still a little too upbeat/"fast" for what normally started off the series.
2) The endings of all ISOS albums were EXPLOSIVE. Prime example: Airtight. I mean, this track is LOUD and ends on a final solid note. All the series ended on a solid one final note. It was a complete conclusion. a true real finale.
and what did ISOS4 end with? Only One [Rave Mix]. ugh. hardly explosive and it fucking fades out at the end!!!! WTF?! Why does a mix CD fade out!? this is something that happens on live albums [i.e. Universal Regligion 2004, etc...]. VERY disappointing.
3) Mixing. previous series were mixed a lot better. with ISOS4, it's not that the beats don't match up - or that you can hear double basslines overlapping horribly....but the mixing is done abruptly. the tracks change i think too fast. i.e tracks 1 to 2 on disc 2. wow.
Previous series were mixed a lot more smoother - and there were longer transitions between tracks. on ISOS2, going from track 13 to 14 , you can hear Airtight like 45 seconds before it even comes around. it's faint - but it builds up to when the track comes in full force. i just think that's amazing.
4) Overall tracks. this did not need to be a 2x CD. honestly, the best 14 or 15 tracks should have been combined into one - and have less "fluff" in between. And i personally hate thank Junkie XL remix of UR. ugh. awful.
Things I liked about ISOS4:
1) Palma Solane. granted, it's not the best starting track, it's still amazing. this i think could have been an amazing ending. one of my fav tracks.
2) Perfect Silence. here we go - this is how an ISOS series should end. fantastic ending. one of my favorite tracks of all time.
3) other tracks: Arcadia, The Loves we Lost, La Noche, Why, Bad [although perhaps not appropriate for an ISOS feel], Netherworld, and Sands of Time & Evolution. But really, these tracks should have just been on ONE album, and not spread about two.
This is just what i think. maybe faster and abrubter mixing is preferred by others. maybe people like the more upbeat feel and the more aggressive intros. but to me, it just doesn't really seem like a TRUE ISOS album.
|
|
Dec-17-2005 22:46
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:57.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|