Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Main Forums > Music Discussion > Marco V. - Godd (offesive lyrics???)
Pages (5): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
Jimykik
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Helena, Montana

Nice work ABT.

I am a Christian and i am not offended by the lyrics. I simply think Marco was trying to get people to think about the subject... the same way a song about love makes you feel and think about love. He is not condoning one religion or saying religion is wrong... he is just asking if you believe in a God and what does this God do for you.

I also have to agree with some of the thoughts that say christians today are hyper-sensitive. While recently, we are being persecuted more than the last century (at least in the States where it used to be that everyone was raised in the church), my fellow christians percieve anything being said about God to be blasphemus. And alot of it is. Christians are being attacked in the schoolrooms and business place. That is why they percieve everything as an attack on their religion.

If you sit back and truely think about what is being said and not try figure out what Marco's reason for putting in vocals for saying this and not saying that, i think you will realize taht their is realy nothing to be offended about. Actually the song was a total success and this thread proves it.

Nick


___________________
Did you know that urine is steril? You can drink it!

Old Post Jan-28-2002 08:13 
Click Here to See the Profile for Jimykik Click here to Send Jimykik a Private Message Add Jimykik to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
kolkiewolkie
muziekjunk



Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Eindhoven

well, since me = christian as well, I think I should put my opinion here as well.

In the beginning, I was indeed a bit offended by the lyrics, but when I downloaded it last week I finally got the chance to listen to it good.

most stuff is already said over here... my conclusion: IF mv is pointing at God (as: the one and only) he doesn't know much 'bout HIM.
God doesn't wares a crown and makes you bow (only when you pray, not: now all bow or else you die or something) (don't think mv IS pointing at him...==>> A godd)

so, he is probably pointing at everything you think is VERY important in your life and cannot deal without it (these things can be 'gods' as well).

then he is ASKING if you believe in him (or the lyrics do): well, I don't, DEFINATELY DONT see him as 'god', so I (in my mind) always think a clear NO, whether he is pointing at the christian God or just some other 'god'.

at this moment: I'm not offended anymore, put some extra power on the speakers when I hear the song!!

greetz kolkiewolkie

ps DONT quote me, cos I think we are in 1 line, but I'm not sure if I made my point of view clear, kinda hard in english to tell the whole story in your mind...


___________________
Progressive

Hard = goed

Old Post Jan-28-2002 09:59  Netherlands
Click Here to See the Profile for kolkiewolkie Click here to Send kolkiewolkie a Private Message Add kolkiewolkie to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
tu_face
No Known Cure...



Registered: Oct 2000
Location: Sheffield, UK

who said that "me" is marco v?

the lyrics are totally open to be taken in any way.. ppl decide to be offended by it then thats their problem

as someone already said.. stop reading into it too much, its only a tune, a bangin one at that!


___________________
MUGGETS

Old Post Jan-28-2002 10:37 
Click Here to See the Profile for tu_face Click here to Send tu_face a Private Message Add tu_face to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Miss Proximus
titelloos



Registered: Mar 2001
Location: Block II, Cell 13

quote:
Originally posted by ABTsportsline
Anywhoo, inatrance: sounds to me you are offended..... and if you aren't (like you claim to be), you are definitely getting offended by the replies, which is even worse! don't let people's replies get to you man! It's ok to stand by your beliefs but don't get pulled into a war that isn't yours!


I feel the same way!!

and Jurica is right...ABT you da man!! I hope ur gonna write a book once or so, cuz I'd love to read it (k)


___________________
Mayibuye Africa!Viva Mexico - Hasta la Chingada!Malaysia I will be there

Old Post Jan-28-2002 12:53  Netherlands
Click Here to See the Profile for Miss Proximus Click here to Send Miss Proximus a Private Message Visit Miss Proximus's homepage! Add Miss Proximus to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Pjotr G
Mindcrawler



Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Netherlands

quote:
Originally posted by ABTsportsline

so my interesting judeo-christian friends, if any of you took logic 101 in school you'd remember in an "OR" arguement you cannot have two trues..... else that would be an "AND" arguement. (see: parallels with binary 1,0)


Ahem
consider this your logic 101
I happen to have finished the course Logic, and am right now taking the course Computational Logic so I think I know what I talk about.
In propositional Logic (but also in subject predicate logic!), if A is true and B is true A v B (read: A or B) is TRUE....look...true is 1, false is 0. I'll explain the difference between AND and OR in the following truth table

A----B-----(A v B)----(A & B)
1----1-------1-----------1
1----0-------1-----------0
0----1-------1-----------0
0----0-------0-----------0

[edit] ok this table looks messed up. why don't spaces make it to the message? I'll redo it [/edit]

The first line reads: A true. B true. A or B true. A and B true. So in that line they are equivalent, BUT not in ALL LINES!

This may not seem correct intuitively, as in plain english OR is usually interpreted (and meant!) as (A v B) & -(A & B) <---(A OR B) AND NOT (A AND B). So you may be right about how you should take up the OR in plain english. But if you use the word logic to empower your words....this doesn't fly!

I don't try to be patronising or something, but I can't let this go...it's...stronger than me


___________________
All rhythm evolves around a kick...

Old Post Jan-28-2002 14:05  Netherlands
Click Here to See the Profile for Pjotr G Click here to Send Pjotr G a Private Message Visit Pjotr G's homepage! Add Pjotr G to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Ste
Planet Zogg Addict



Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Outer Dementia

dont use gods name in vain :O



anyway its spelt Godd. PUNKS! ahem


___________________
Fave Tune at the Moment: Mesmerizer - Taking Control

>>> Download my mix here <<< (Electro, Techno & Psy-Trance)

Old Post Jan-28-2002 14:31  England
Click Here to See the Profile for Ste Click here to Send Ste a Private Message Visit Ste's homepage! Add Ste to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Hell_Copter
UplifTingHaRdTrancEAddicT



Registered: Nov 2001
Location: israel

i'm not offensive of those words...
i'm looking on it that way...
it's just a song and y should i let a ong's lyrics affect me!?
it's not like the song trying to give us a massage or something...
therefore it has no reason to affect me


___________________
.

Old Post Jan-28-2002 14:32 
Click Here to See the Profile for Hell_Copter Click here to Send Hell_Copter a Private Message Add Hell_Copter to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
inatrance
Arcteryx ClimbAddict



Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Seattle, WA

mm.. kk well I am just going to post one more on this subject

honestly, it does not offend me, I've actually never even heard the song, because my radio rip was so bad. but what I was trying to say in the first place is that, if someone is offended, someone is offended.. but then again people are offended by almost anything and everything.


hmm.. the more I think about it, the more I think that Marco V, is reffering to "Godd" or "a Godd" as the material possesions in their life.

Example: Say somebody just bought a brand new car, and everyday they clean this car, and nurture it, and avoid people just to be with their car (basically worshiping it) I was gonna add put up and alter.. ya but maybe that is going to far


quote:
Do you believe in a god that satisfies,
do you believe in a god that opens eyes,
do you believe in a god that tells you lies,
or do u believe in me?

Do you believe in a god that brings you down,
do u believe in a god that wears a crown,
do u believe in a god that makes u bow,
or do u believe in me?



okay it is my opinion that he is saying such material possesions, like the car, control people's lives, making the bow down.. because it consumes so much of their life; and that is why he is asking "a god"

I am no genious.. so whatever.. sorry if I've been pissen people off, I just think in general that we've got a pretty "atheistic" group.. and I am only saying this because of past discussions about God, and religion, etc. ..and just the overall feeling I get from people when such a topic is discussed; so I am just trying to be the one stickin up for those who are religious but not saying anything.
I'm not gonna post anymore, so plz don't flame me

peace
inatrance

Old Post Jan-28-2002 14:50 
Click Here to See the Profile for inatrance Click here to Send inatrance a Private Message Add inatrance to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
ABTsportsline
Disabled Veteran



Registered: May 2001
Location: Rural WA, USA

quote:
Originally posted by Pjotr G


Ahem
consider this your logic 101
I happen to have finished the course Logic, and am right now taking the course Computational Logic so I think I know what I talk about.
In propositional Logic (but also in subject predicate logic!), if A is true and B is true A v B (read: A or B) is TRUE....look...true is 1, false is 0. I'll explain the difference between AND and OR in the following truth table

A----B-----(A v B)----(A & B)
1----1-------1-----------1
1----0-------1-----------0
0----1-------1-----------0
0----0-------0-----------0

[edit] ok this table looks messed up. why don't spaces make it to the message? I'll redo it [/edit]

The first line reads: A true. B true. A or B true. A and B true. So in that line they are equivalent, BUT not in ALL LINES!

This may not seem correct intuitively, as in plain english OR is usually interpreted (and meant!) as (A v B) & -(A & B) <---(A OR B) AND NOT (A AND B). So you may be right about how you should take up the OR in plain english. But if you use the word logic to empower your words....this doesn't fly!

I don't try to be patronising or something, but I can't let this go...it's...stronger than me


FYI computational logic has different theorems and laws than theoretical logic. I didn't take computational logic, although i am familiar with it, and i did have a course on discreet technology (digital chip programming with the binary system.....)

The thing is we are BOTH right here.... you misread what i originally said, however. Yes, A and B can both be trues in a table, but i'm referring to output.... You can only have 1... NOT two. But computational logic isn't the same as theoretical logic... In theoretical logic, there can not be two trues in an OR statement. You don't have to be a genius to figure this out. In fact, even morons can compute this in their brains. If someone asks you if you want this OR that..... you can't have both. Use common sense.

Anyway i think the thread's original problem has been solved.

Inatrance: we weren't flaming you

-ABT-


___________________
Peace.

Old Post Jan-28-2002 16:45  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for ABTsportsline Click here to Send ABTsportsline a Private Message Add ABTsportsline to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Jah
i just want to wear a hat



Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Australia, Perth

haha i love ABT's arguments there always so well thought out and structured i bet you were hell good at english!


___________________

Old Post Jan-28-2002 17:01 
Click Here to See the Profile for Jah Click here to Send Jah a Private Message Add Jah to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
djVersus
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Mar 2001
Location:

yes, some may find it a bit offensive.
I'm sure it was a sample that marco v stumbled upon, I'm sure he doesn't mean to offend anyone.

I personally don't really care for this tune. Take out the lyrics, and what have you got? not much.

c mon guys, marco v isn't exactly the worlds best lyricist, I don't know why some of you are taking it this far.


___________________
I see the music, I hear the light

Old Post Jan-28-2002 17:12 
Click Here to See the Profile for djVersus Click here to Send djVersus a Private Message Add djVersus to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Cable
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jul 2001
Location: South Africa

i'm more likely to be offended by someone calling paul van dyk god

Old Post Jan-28-2002 19:32  South Africa
Click Here to See the Profile for Cable Click here to Send Cable a Private Message Add Cable to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Main Forums > Music Discussion > Marco V. - Godd (offesive lyrics???)
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (5): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackHeavy prog deep tune from last Digweed Transitions 003 guest - Fortier [2006] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackK90 - Genetik [2002]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 13:23.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!