|
| quote: | Originally posted by beats and beeps
Regardless, can't you see the reason behind using a genre title, as a way of finding similar sounds.
Just because genres may be difficult to keep up with, or keep track of, is not reason for them not to serve a useful purpose.
I don't see why you would be so quick to judge the value of this genre, because in my opinion, rock could use more genres, where as EDM has way more genres defined (or maybe undefined would be a better word) already than it needs. |
Not only do I disagree with your entire post, but I'd like to emphasize just how idiotic I think it is that this genre of "Stoner Rock" even exists, especially when the vast majority of Stoners don't listen to shit that's even close to the bands everyone seems to be describing in here.
"Stoner" rock can be anything that you enjoy listening to when you're stoned, not some ultra pretentious title for bullshit rock music that isn't very good anyway.
And no, Rock doesn't need any more genres. There are enough shit rock bands out there already, we don't need even more trying to pigeonhole themselves into progressively more and more random and meaningless subgenres.
___________________
last minute disco dot net
|