|
| quote: | Originally posted by Danny Ocean
i see your point, you think im forcing education. Well, maybe it comes off that way, but in the end it's their choice if they want to listen or not. Im not pointing a gun to their heads. If they want to listen, good for them, it will open their minds a bit more, if they don't then they can go fuck themselves, and i just waste some time, but at least i tried. They should thank me either way. |
No, I don't think that. I understand where you're coming from, but I'm just saying that that's the way it's perceived by ignorant people, when those who are more educated correct them without invitation. However, taking the stance that you're doing them a favor certainly won't do much good, since they didn't ask for it in the first place.
Note: I'm not talking about you or anyone else specifically, just debating the concepts in principle...i.e. Danny, I'm not saying you're condescending, or, diggerz, you're ignorant.
With that in mind, keep in mind, guys, that "better" is not objective with regards to music. "Complex," "advanced," "cohesive," "innovative," etc.--those are all matters of fact, but to one person, a song could be better for its simplicity, imitable vocals, and the fact that a lot of other people like it, while another person's preferences might lead them to the conclusion that a track is "better" due to highly proficient production. Both people are right in their respective assessments--a Vengaboys production might correctly be determined to be just as "good" as one from Richard James.
___________________
> S u s h i p u n k . P h o t o g r a p h y <
|
