Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > Democracy Now! televised debate: Loose Change vs Popular Mechanics
Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion



Registered: Jul 2002
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
Well, you have alot more to loose if these guys did infact orchestrate 9-11, or had forknowledge (which they did) and deliberately allowed 9-11 taking place, and still being in office, as opposed to neigther one of those and being in office. Eighter way (orchestration or deliberate inaction), it makes perfect sense for them to do so. They couldn't have begun their implementation of PNAC's 'Rebuilding Americas Defences' agenda with out "some catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl Harbor." I don't why understand somone as intelligent as yourself doesn't connect those dots, when it's in black and white in their own agenda/document. "Incompetence" is a very convenient projected/perceived public image isn't it?

EDIT:Formatting and corrections.


ive pointed out time and time again that this document has nothing to do with 9/11, doesnt mention anything even remotely connected to 9/11 and its thoroughly dishonest of you guys to keep posting this rubbish. have you read that entire document? nothing at all to do with 9/11. stop reaching for meaning, its just not there

as for popular mechanics debating the NORAD stuff, theyre into physical sciences not the public sphere of government organisation.


___________________

Old Post Oct-11-2006 22:19  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for pkcRAISTLIN Click here to Send pkcRAISTLIN a Private Message Add pkcRAISTLIN to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Fir3start3r
Armin Acolyte



Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
ive pointed out time and time again that this document has nothing to do with 9/11, doesnt mention anything even remotely connected to 9/11 and its thoroughly dishonest of you guys to keep posting this rubbish. have you read that entire document? nothing at all to do with 9/11. stop reaching for meaning, its just not there

as for popular mechanics debating the NORAD stuff, theyre into physical sciences not the public sphere of government organisation.


Exactly.

Let's not try and force square pegs in round holes...


___________________
"...End? No, the journey doesn't end here. Death is just another path...one that we all must take.
The grey rain-curtain of this world rolls back, and all change to silver glass...and then you see it...
...white shores...and beyond...the far green country under a swift sunrise."

Old Post Oct-11-2006 22:21  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for Fir3start3r Click here to Send Fir3start3r a Private Message Add Fir3start3r to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Shakka
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2003
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
That is not incompetence, that's Cheney ensuring an attack on the pentagon. It's complicity, end of story.


You really believe this whole "war on terror" thing is a concoction of some crazy New World Order/PNAC/Freemason/Skull & Bones conspiracy, don't you!

Old Post Oct-11-2006 22:32  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Shakka Click here to Send Shakka a Private Message Add Shakka to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
shaolin_Z
Hei Hu Quan



Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Austin, Texas, USA: TXTA #102

quote:
Originally posted by Shakka
You really believe this whole "war on terror" thing is a concoction of some crazy New World Order/PNAC/Freemason/Skull & Bones conspiracy, don't you!


PNAC, yes (i.e. American hegemony and global dominance). The whole "war on terror" ascpect can't be taken seriously considering how we've sponsored and carried out most of it (NOTE: not a referrence to 9-11 or post 9-11 era). Shouldn't we be bombing the shit out of ourselves first in that case?


___________________
"The Greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." -Stephen Hawking
"First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me— and there was no one left to speak out for me." -Martin Niemöller

Old Post Oct-11-2006 23:33  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for shaolin_Z Click here to Send shaolin_Z a Private Message Add shaolin_Z to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion



Registered: Jul 2002
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
PNAC, yes (i.e. American hegemony and global dominance).


and doing so through maintaining superior technical advantage and integrating information technology further into the military, NOT by orchestrating terror attacks on american soil


___________________

Old Post Oct-11-2006 23:35  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for pkcRAISTLIN Click here to Send pkcRAISTLIN a Private Message Add pkcRAISTLIN to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
shaolin_Z
Hei Hu Quan



Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Austin, Texas, USA: TXTA #102

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
and doing so through maintaining superior technical advantage and integrating information technology further into the military, NOT by orchestrating terror attacks on american soil


No, by going to war and invading key locations to builid military bases, install regimes subservient to the US and US interests, control resources the entire world is dependant on etc.


___________________
"The Greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." -Stephen Hawking
"First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me— and there was no one left to speak out for me." -Martin Niemöller

Old Post Oct-11-2006 23:37  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for shaolin_Z Click here to Send shaolin_Z a Private Message Add shaolin_Z to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion



Registered: Jul 2002
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
No, by going to war and invading key locations to builid military bases, install regimes subservient to the US and US interests, control resources the entire world is dependant on etc.


yes. but not by orchestrating terror attacks on US soil.


___________________

Old Post Oct-11-2006 23:40  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for pkcRAISTLIN Click here to Send pkcRAISTLIN a Private Message Add pkcRAISTLIN to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
shaolin_Z
Hei Hu Quan



Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Austin, Texas, USA: TXTA #102

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
yes. but not by orchestrating terror attacks on US soil.


Well, did they specifically mention and feel the need for a "new pearl harbor" to get the American people (enthusiastically or reluctantly) behind it.


___________________
"The Greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." -Stephen Hawking
"First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me— and there was no one left to speak out for me." -Martin Niemöller

Old Post Oct-11-2006 23:46  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for shaolin_Z Click here to Send shaolin_Z a Private Message Add shaolin_Z to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion



Registered: Jul 2002
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
Well, did they specifically mention and feel the need for a "new pearl harbor" to get the American people (enthusiastically or reluctantly) behind it.


no they did NOT.

they were saying that the revolution in military technology will likely be a slow one, unless another pearl harbour occured, ie an attack that they did not have a counter for. this often mis-quoted text has nothing to do with garnering public support for a war based on a "new pearl harbour" attack by terrorists.

the revolution in military technology and information systems will be a slow and gradual process, unless someone pulls the american military's undies up over their head. then, this transformation would be much faster as they combatted this new form of military tactic or technology.


___________________

Old Post Oct-11-2006 23:54  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for pkcRAISTLIN Click here to Send pkcRAISTLIN a Private Message Add pkcRAISTLIN to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
shaolin_Z
Hei Hu Quan



Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Austin, Texas, USA: TXTA #102

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
no they did NOT.

they were saying that the revolution in military technology will likely be a slow one, unless another pearl harbour occured, ie an attack that they did not have a counter for. this often mis-quoted text has nothing to do with garnering public support for a war based on a "new pearl harbour" attack by terrorists.

the revolution in military technology and information systems will be a slow and gradual process, unless someone pulls the american military's undies up over their head. then, this transformation would be much faster as they combatted this new form of military tactic or technology.


Read the entire document. It's about ALOT more than just "superior military technology and integrated information technology." You don't need be a 9-11 "conspiracy theorist" to understand this.

EDIT:
quote:

hope is the denial of reality - raistlin majere.


EDIT2: Yes, I know exactly what you're response to ^^ will be .


___________________
"The Greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." -Stephen Hawking
"First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me— and there was no one left to speak out for me." -Martin Niemöller

Last edited by shaolin_Z on Oct-12-2006 at 00:04

Old Post Oct-11-2006 23:58  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for shaolin_Z Click here to Send shaolin_Z a Private Message Add shaolin_Z to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion



Registered: Jul 2002
Location:

i have read much of the document. not all of it granted, but it IS pretty boring

and yes, you indeed do need your 9/11 hat on to see the "new pearl harbour" = 9/11 attacks. indeed the entire document only mentions it twice, and both were in the context i mentioned.


___________________

Old Post Oct-12-2006 00:02  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for pkcRAISTLIN Click here to Send pkcRAISTLIN a Private Message Add pkcRAISTLIN to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > Democracy Now! televised debate: Loose Change vs Popular Mechanics
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackhouse track...needed [2004] [2]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackNo One Driving - "Playa Sol" [2003]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 13:14.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!