You mean the Xone 62 I think? (not the 464?)

The Xone:92 is definately worth the extra cash:

- Much better cue'ing system, with pre/post EQ button, a cue/master knob (which you can "simulate" on the 62, but it's a pain).

- Two aux sends, instead of 1

- The faders on the 92 are like other DJ mixers, on the 62 they are studio style. This is up to you.

- The 92 has two completely separate filter units that aren't tied to the crossfader select controls. You also gain the separate LFO for each filter.

- More LED's for channel meters on the 92

On the 92 you lose:

- EQ on/off button

quote:

Originally posted by montie Is this the only difference between the Xone 92 and the Xone 64? If not what are the other differences. I'm thinking about picking up a Xone mixer as I'm in the market for a new mixer. Is it worth the extra $300-$400 to get the 92?

quote:

Originally posted by Ryan0751 You mean the Xone 62 I think? (not the 464?) The Xone:92 is definately worth the extra cash: - Much better cue'ing system, with pre/post EQ button, a cue/master knob (which you can "simulate" on the 62, but it's a pain). - Two aux sends, instead of 1 - The faders on the 92 are like other DJ mixers, on the 62 they are studio style. This is up to you. - The 92 has two completely separate filter units that aren't tied to the crossfader select controls. You also gain the separate LFO for each filter. - More LED's for channel meters on the 92 On the 92 you lose: - EQ on/off button

Cool thanks!
(and yes I did mean the 62 )

Thats what I needed to know

I think I'm leaning towards the 92

I have the rotary 92 and I love it. Depending on what you mix its well worth it.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by DOOMBOT Man this sucks... LOL But no, really, I've never used one before. That extra mid seems a bit intimidating.

its a tough life

___________________
Check out my Podcast for some bootshaking House & Techno!

http://chrisharrington.podomatic.com

quote:

Originally posted by chris harrington its a tough life