|
| quote: | Originally posted by Jarvmeister
Nope - this is what I mean:
Get 2 people - exactly the same.
Get two tracks, with, for the sake of argument, the same qualities across the board.
Produce one with old technology, one with new. So long as the same level of skill goes into each, out the other end will come a better production, INO, from the new technology.
Me and a mate were discussing thsi the other day, you can't easlity mix a classic 98 trancer (like, for example TBR - Trancewave) with a modern trancer (Like for example Hydragen - Creature Of Habit) becuase they are such different levels of production.
Don't get me wrong - a classic track is a classic track, and nothing can take that away from it - but a modern more polished track, of equal ingenuity and quality, brings more to the table.
Jarv |
yeah but still does the lack of polished sound limit the tunes other quality aspects? the problem is not the technology actually. the main problem is that the majority of the trance tunes produced today aren't anything you will remember for a longer time. it just goes right through your ears. one may argue and say "you only cherish that tune because you put it into a historical context". maybe so but I would also say that the tunes back in the 90s were more diverse. you could have several different sounds from one label. The labels were not limiting itself to just one sound. You had more diversity together with hungry producers which didn't only strive after being played by the biggest DJs.
___________________
My new oldskool TRANCE mix!
|