Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > DJ Booth > DJM-800 vs Xone:92 vs Xone:3D
Pages (7): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA

A Rane 2016 or Urei 1620 is still a better rotary than the 92... you don't get all the features, but the feel and size/spacing of the knobs, not to mention the fader curves, are more representative of how a rotary should really be. The 92 is definately great, but not quite the same.

Old Post Jun-29-2007 01:17  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Ryan0751 Click here to Send Ryan0751 a Private Message Add Ryan0751 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
SPAWNmaster
DJ/Producer



Registered: Jun 2006
Location: Boston, USA

quote:
Originally posted by Clovis
I disagree, I'd even much rather play on a DJM-600 than an 800. The EQ curves on the 800 are horrible to me, and I hate the ridiculously bass-heavy sound it has. Even with sony 7506 the bass in the cans is just ridiculous. The effects are nice and the faders are smooth, but the filter is nothing like the xone's.

The 92 Rotary has to be one of the nicest mixers I've ever played on, though I heard the Rane is comparable if not even smoother.

I just love the EQing on the 92, and the cue sound setup is very nicely done too.


just have to say that as someone who owns the djm800 and have played on hte 600 as well, have to completely disagree with everything youve just said (except about the filters). but everyones entitled to their opinion ofcourse.


___________________
http://www.djandrewgarcia.com

Old Post Jun-29-2007 02:37  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for SPAWNmaster Click here to Send SPAWNmaster a Private Message Visit SPAWNmaster's homepage! Add SPAWNmaster to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
agentdansmith
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Cannock, UK

quote:
Originally posted by Ryan0751
Uhh, they shouldn't be.

EQ's aren't even required to mix perfectly, pick the right tracks and learn level control.


I know what you're saying but, I find that the faders on my 92 feel so loose and light that it's difficult to get a slow and smooth fade on them without a sudden level drop.

However, I love the feel of the eq's and filter knobs on the 92 so enjoy using them to mix with


___________________
::::: DjTrig.Com :::::
Afterward - July 2009 Mix

Old Post Jul-02-2007 10:07  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for agentdansmith Click here to Send agentdansmith a Private Message Visit agentdansmith's homepage! Add agentdansmith to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Andrømeda
Suspended User



Registered: May 2006
Location: Miami

800 has a analogue dsp processor

pioneer wins

Old Post Jul-02-2007 11:43  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Andrømeda Click here to Send Andrømeda a Private Message Visit Andrømeda's homepage! Add Andrømeda to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
RJT
last minute disco



Registered: Oct 2004
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by agentdansmith
I know what you're saying but, I find that the faders on my 92 feel so loose and light that it's difficult to get a slow and smooth fade on them without a sudden level drop.

However, I love the feel of the eq's and filter knobs on the 92 so enjoy using them to mix with


Exactly. There is quite literally no resistance at all on the 92's upfaders. Drives me nuts.


___________________
last minute disco dot net

Old Post Jul-02-2007 12:47 
Click Here to See the Profile for RJT Click here to Send RJT a Private Message Visit RJT's homepage! Add RJT to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Cro_Addict
Shit 'N Piss



Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Detroit (formerly Toronto (formerly Winsdor))

quote:
Originally posted by Andrømeda
800 has a analogue dsp processor

pioneer wins


that makes no sense.....

how can it have an analogue digital signal processor?

Old Post Jul-02-2007 13:08  Cuba
Click Here to See the Profile for Cro_Addict Click here to Send Cro_Addict a Private Message Add Cro_Addict to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA

Umm that doesn't make any sense.

The DJM-800 has a DSP in it.

It also has ADC's (analog digital converters) which convert sound from analog decks (either CDJ's not using SPDIF, TT's, or the mic) to digital before dumping the signal to the DSP. The mixer also has DAC's (digital to analog converters) to convert the sound back to analog on the way out of the mixer (if you aren't using the SPDIF out, but at some point, you have to convert the sound to analog anyway before you can amplify it).

The 800 has a very clean signal path, but they doesn't mean it sounds "better" than the 92 or any other high end mixer (Rane, Urei, Bozak). They all sound a little "different", but it's a lot of preference. Any mixer over $1000 better sound damn good

Digital is not necessarily better than analog and vice versa.

Oh, the V6's valves are intended to "warm up" digitally sourced material.

quote:
Originally posted by DJPaulino2
well it supports signals up to 92 kHz, far superior in audio quality to any allen and heath mixer except for the V6 because it has Valve tubes.

Old Post Jul-02-2007 13:26  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Ryan0751 Click here to Send Ryan0751 a Private Message Add Ryan0751 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DJPaulino4
Guest



Registered: Not Yet
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by Ryan0751
Umm that doesn't make any sense.

The DJM-800 has a DSP in it.

It also has ADC's (analog digital converters) which convert sound from analog decks (either CDJ's not using SPDIF, TT's, or the mic) to digital before dumping the signal to the DSP. The mixer also has DAC's (digital to analog converters) to convert the sound back to analog on the way out of the mixer (if you aren't using the SPDIF out, but at some point, you have to convert the sound to analog anyway before you can amplify it).

The 800 has a very clean signal path, but they doesn't mean it sounds "better" than the 92 or any other high end mixer (Rane, Urei, Bozak). They all sound a little "different", but it's a lot of preference. Any mixer over $1000 better sound damn good

Digital is not necessarily better than analog and vice versa.

Oh, the V6's valves are intended to "warm up" digitally sourced material.


you never stop do you? you and your mumbo jumbo, doesn't even know what i'm talking about. You got owned on the Tech 12 vs Cdj1000 thread, now its my turn for this thread.

The DJM 800 Has a DSP 96 kHz Signal processor, meaning it supports audio up to that quality, the other mixers do not. Every mixer has a an ADC, Every computer has an ADC.

Edit-also the valve tube amps does warm not only digital but also analogue and beam sound and ultra sonar sound, hell any sound.

goodbye

Old Post Jul-02-2007 14:08 
Add  to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA

Umm, not every mixer has and ADC. The Xone's are ANALOG mixers. They do not have any digital components in them, except the MIDI clock in the 92.

You are a complete and utter idiot. Stop spouting this nonsense because there are lots of beginners on this forum who will take it as fact, when clearly you are uneducated on the ins and outs of technology.

And you need to read up more on the V6. The valves are optional, in fact they originally were supplied only on 4 channels, the latest model it comes on all channels. The Xone S6 is essentially a V6 minus the valve pre-amps. The intended use of the pre-amps is to warm up sound coming from CD decks, which is why they didn't include them on all channels originally (assuming the users would use the other two channels for analog turntables).

FYI: I'm a 31 year old senior software engineer with an engineering background and education. This is all pretty basic stuff, you need to learn a lot more and lose the attitude if you intend on making it anywhere in life. And oh, I've actually DJ'd in clubs.

quote:
Originally posted by DJPaulino4
you never stop do you? you and your mumbo jumbo, doesn't even know what i'm talking about. You got owned on the Tech 12 vs Cdj1000 thread, now its my turn for this thread.

The DJM 800 Has a DSP 96 kHz Signal processor, meaning it supports audio up to that quality, the other mixers do not. Every mixer has a an ADC, Every computer has an ADC.

Edit-also the valve tube amps does warm not only digital but also analogue and beam sound and ultra sonar sound, hell any sound.

goodbye

Old Post Jul-02-2007 14:24  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Ryan0751 Click here to Send Ryan0751 a Private Message Add Ryan0751 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
agentdansmith
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Cannock, UK

quote:
Originally posted by djpaulino3
and plus only channels 5-6 have tubes on the V6, and i know that by memory not research like you.

THERE FINETO


I rather believe someone who knows their stuff from research rather than memory to be honest mate


___________________
::::: DjTrig.Com :::::
Afterward - July 2009 Mix

Old Post Jul-02-2007 14:37  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for agentdansmith Click here to Send agentdansmith a Private Message Visit agentdansmith's homepage! Add agentdansmith to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA

From the allen and heath website:

http://www.xone.co.uk/v6/
Valve [Tube] Section
All channels each have a stereo valve [tube] preamplifier - ideal for mellowing harsh digital music sources

Are you doing this to be funny?

From Pioneer site:
High Quality Audio
The analog signal from the player passes through the shortest signal route, first digitized at 24bit/96kHz through a pro A/D converter where it reaches the digital mixing stage with the best sound possible. The mixing is carried out by 32bit DSP with minimal deterioration of sound quality. A highly rigid chassis minimizes unnecessary vibration, which could adversely affect sound quality. The mixer also incorporates a dual-shield structure for eliminating entry of digital noise and a high performance power supply for noise-free power.

You clearly don't know the difference between an ADC and a DSP. Or much of anything really.

quote:
Originally posted by djpaulino3
i siad that out of anger cuz you always find a weakness in my post, i destyoed your post dealing with 92 kHz signal and i made a mistake by saying every mixer has an adc, no, every computer has adc

and plus only channels 5-6 have tubes on the V6, and i know that by memory not research like you.

the only way you can counter this is with the research part and don't even try it cuz you take 20 mins to post and i only take a few seconds.

THERE FINETO

Old Post Jul-02-2007 14:42  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Ryan0751 Click here to Send Ryan0751 a Private Message Add Ryan0751 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA

Umm, I said that in my post. V6 valves, S6 no valves.

quote:
Originally posted by djpaulino3
and another piece of evidence, only the V6 has tubes and the S6 doesn;t, your wrong again ryan, i'm at the site right now

Old Post Jul-02-2007 14:44  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Ryan0751 Click here to Send Ryan0751 a Private Message Add Ryan0751 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > DJ Booth > DJM-800 vs Xone:92 vs Xone:3D
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (7): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackHard trance tune from mid to late 90's. [2015] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackEor - The Hard Shit [2002]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 15:54.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!