|
| quote: | Originally posted by Ryan0751
Umm that doesn't make any sense.
The DJM-800 has a DSP in it.
It also has ADC's (analog digital converters) which convert sound from analog decks (either CDJ's not using SPDIF, TT's, or the mic) to digital before dumping the signal to the DSP. The mixer also has DAC's (digital to analog converters) to convert the sound back to analog on the way out of the mixer (if you aren't using the SPDIF out, but at some point, you have to convert the sound to analog anyway before you can amplify it).
The 800 has a very clean signal path, but they doesn't mean it sounds "better" than the 92 or any other high end mixer (Rane, Urei, Bozak). They all sound a little "different", but it's a lot of preference. Any mixer over $1000 better sound damn good 
Digital is not necessarily better than analog and vice versa.
Oh, the V6's valves are intended to "warm up" digitally sourced material. |
you never stop do you? you and your mumbo jumbo, doesn't even know what i'm talking about. You got owned on the Tech 12 vs Cdj1000 thread, now its my turn for this thread.
The DJM 800 Has a DSP 96 kHz Signal processor, meaning it supports audio up to that quality, the other mixers do not. Every mixer has a an ADC, Every computer has an ADC.
Edit-also the valve tube amps does warm not only digital but also analogue and beam sound and ultra sonar sound, hell any sound.
goodbye
|