|
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
whats the difference between "writing style" and being "well written"? either way, that first book reads like a student's rough draft. absolutely terrible. |
Well, the fact that you don't know the difference between "simple writing" and "well written" degrades your opinion on literary work in my eyes. Sorry.
It's just like anything, there's a simple or complex way to achieve a task, but either way can have a good or bad result. Rowling's writing is simple, yet very effective.
What I basically mean is that although she doesn't use big, complex words, her sentence structure and flow of ideas is supreme. In particular her character development is good. There are a lot of characters, yet she establishes each one as having a distinct personality, and makes them all memorable, which is more than I can say for many adult books I have read.
| quote: | yeah, witches riding broomsticks. never heard of that before.
it might be fine for people with the reading age of about 5, but its a blight on the entire scifi/fantasy genre. |
Well, if you're going to go by that criteria, every fantasy novel since Lord Of The Rings is an unoriginal piece of shit because it uses Elves, Magicians, Orcs, Trolls, Giants, Dragons etc etc.
While Harry Potter may use an un-original concept as its basis, the STORY (not the setting) is extremely original. The way all the spells have been made-up, and the hogwarts castle with moving portraits etc, are all original and interesting ideas.
p.s not saying HP is better than Dragonlance, because I haven't read it. Only that HP is good.
___________________
Mix archive | Melbourne club guide
|