|
| quote: | Originally posted by architect1803
I wanted to clarify something here real quick, in case we're thinking on the wrong side, though, not pointing fingers at anyone in particular.
I'm not praising Moore for his work on SiCKO, as far as what he had to say or what message he is trying to get out. I'd just seen the movie online and thought it would be courteous to show support on how the film was put together, rather than why it was put together.
For the most part, I think Moore, along with his fat friends have much much, much more work to do to try to get a whole community to disgrace our health care system and beat down the elite with their cameras, if you can even call it a "defeat".
Back to my Sam Adams Lager. |
I haven't even bothered to see this so called 'greatness'. I saw his documentary for Columbine and it was o.k, a bit over the top.
Hmm, I haven't seen 'Grindhouse' yet, but it seems far more entertaining than this.
___________________
"I think the scientific and the artistic spirit have something in common. The scientist wants not only to learn the facts, but to understand how they cohere, fit together and make a whole. He even uses criteria such as beauty and symmetry to help decide which theory he wants.
The scientist cannot capture the whole cosmos in thought. In his mind he makes a kind of microcosm, which we see as an analogue of the cosmos. In this way we try to get a feeling for the whole. The artist, I suppose, gets a feeling for the whole some other way.”
David Bohm in “Art, Dialogue and the Implicate Order”, published in On Creativity RC (Routledge Classics)
|