|
*shrug* I remember having to constantly correct the CDJ-100s to keep things in check when mixing progressive down around 135 BPM. The pitch differentials even out at certain BPMs whereas they end up in weird places at other ratios, so this might be a contributing factor. Pretty much anyone mixing around 142 BPM is going to be fine with the old (erroneous) law of sevens, but that won't fly when you're dabbling in other ranges. My finickiness probably has a lot to do with my chosen style--psytrance--which is notoriously overproduced and highly synthetic in nature. Slightly out-of-phase can sound just as awful as badly out-of-phase, so it is very important to keep those beats locked and good. For that reason, I place more value in pitch resolution than some others might. Still, I find it ridiculous that the 800--nominally a higher-end deck than the 200--has such a shabby pitch resolution. This is, to me, a question of whether you want to spend additional money to struggle with technology, or go with equipment that makes your life easier and frees up time for better things than hovering over the jog and giving precise taps all the time. If you look at vinyl, its only when you get lazy with the pitch control that you have to bother with such a thing. With the CDJ-800s, inaccuracy is built-in; it's a consequence of the design. Seems foolish to me.
|